Assessment of the Value of Rescreening for Syphilis in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy

Objectives. Our aim is evaluating the need for repeating tests for syphilis on pregnant women in the third trimester. Study design. A single-center retrospective cohort study was performed on all women delivering 7/03-6/04. Results. During the study interval, 2244 women delivered at our hospital. Of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rodney K. Edwards (Author), Margaret Bennett (Author), Carrie Langstraat (Author), Daina Greene (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Hindawi Limited, 2006-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_c92e788af11f4c74b991e74c585c531b
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Rodney K. Edwards  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Margaret Bennett  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Carrie Langstraat  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Daina Greene  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Assessment of the Value of Rescreening for Syphilis in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy 
260 |b Hindawi Limited,   |c 2006-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1064-7449 
500 |a 1098-0997 
500 |a 10.1155/IDOG/2006/56504 
520 |a Objectives. Our aim is evaluating the need for repeating tests for syphilis on pregnant women in the third trimester. Study design. A single-center retrospective cohort study was performed on all women delivering 7/03-6/04. Results. During the study interval, 2244 women delivered at our hospital. Of those women having available records and attending at least one prenatal visit, 1940 (98.9%) were screened for syphilis at the first prenatal visit. Of the 1627 women beginning prenatal care prior to 27 weeks and delivering after 32 weeks, 1377 (84.6%) were rescreened in the third trimester. No cases of syphilis were identified with either the initial (upper limit of 95% CI 0.24%) or repeat (upper limit of 95% CI 0.34%) screening. Conclusions. In our obstetric population, syphilis is so uncommon that mandated prenatal screening on more than one occasion seems unjustified and laws requiring repeated screening should be reevaluated. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Gynecology and obstetrics 
690 |a RG1-991 
690 |a Infectious and parasitic diseases 
690 |a RC109-216 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol 2006 (2006) 
787 0 |n http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/IDOG/2006/56504 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1064-7449 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1098-0997 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/c92e788af11f4c74b991e74c585c531b  |z Connect to this object online.