Low dose radiation and cancer in A-bomb survivors: latency and non-linear dose-response in the 1950-90 mortality cohort
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Analyses of Japanese A-bomb survivors' cancer mortality risks are used to establish recommended annual dose limits, currently set at 1 mSv (public) and 20 mSv (occupational). Do radiation doses below 20 mSv have significant impa...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
BMC,
2007-01-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Analyses of Japanese A-bomb survivors' cancer mortality risks are used to establish recommended annual dose limits, currently set at 1 mSv (public) and 20 mSv (occupational). Do radiation doses below 20 mSv have significant impact on cancer mortality in Japanese A-bomb survivors, and is the dose-response linear?</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>I analyse stomach, liver, lung, colon, uterus, and all-solid cancer mortality in the 0 - 20 mSv colon dose subcohort of the 1950-90 (grouped) mortality cohort, by Poisson regression using a time-lagged colon dose to detect latency, while controlling for gender, attained age, and age-at-exposure. I compare linear and non-linear models, including one adapted from the cellular bystander effect for α particles.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>With a lagged linear model, Excess Relative Risk (ERR) for the liver and all-solid cancers is significantly positive and several orders of magnitude above extrapolations from the Life Span Study Report 12 analysis of the full cohort. Non-linear models are strongly superior to the linear model for the stomach (latency 11.89 years), liver (36.90), lung (13.60) and all-solid (43.86) in fitting the 0 - 20 mSv data and show significant positive ERR at 0.25 mSv and 10 mSv lagged dose. The slope of the dose-response near zero is several orders of magnitude above the slope at high doses.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The standard linear model applied to the full 1950-90 cohort greatly underestimates the risks at low doses, which are significant when the 0 - 20 mSv subcohort is modelled with latency. Non-linear models give a much better fit and are compatible with a bystander effect.</p> |
---|---|
Item Description: | 10.1186/1476-069X-6-1 1476-069X |