Comparative Effectiveness of Ampicillin/Sulbactam versus Cefazolin as Targeted Therapy for Bacteremia Caused by Beta-Lactamase-Producing Methicillin-Sensitive <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Cefazolin (CFZ) is the first-line treatment for beta-lactamase-producing methicillin-sensitive <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (BP-MSSA) infection. In 2019, Japan experienced a CFZ shortage because of foreign object inclusion in a batch. Ampicillin/sulbactam (SAM) was preferred in many case...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jun Hirai (Author), Nobuhiro Asai (Author), Mao Hagihara (Author), Takaaki Kishino (Author), Hideo Kato (Author), Daisuke Sakanashi (Author), Wataru Ohashi (Author), Hiroshige Mikamo (Author)
Format: Book
Published: MDPI AG, 2022-10-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_ca5968978c9e4e36a2685b4d1cc81b9d
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Jun Hirai  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Nobuhiro Asai  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mao Hagihara  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Takaaki Kishino  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Hideo Kato  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Daisuke Sakanashi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Wataru Ohashi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Hiroshige Mikamo  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Comparative Effectiveness of Ampicillin/Sulbactam versus Cefazolin as Targeted Therapy for Bacteremia Caused by Beta-Lactamase-Producing Methicillin-Sensitive <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>: A Single-Center Retrospective Study 
260 |b MDPI AG,   |c 2022-10-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.3390/antibiotics11111505 
500 |a 2079-6382 
520 |a Cefazolin (CFZ) is the first-line treatment for beta-lactamase-producing methicillin-sensitive <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (BP-MSSA) infection. In 2019, Japan experienced a CFZ shortage because of foreign object inclusion in a batch. Ampicillin/sulbactam (SAM) was preferred in many cases as definitive therapy for the treatment of BP-MSSA bacteremia to preserve broad-spectrum antibiotic stock. However, there are no previous studies reporting the clinical efficacy of SAM for BP-MSSA bacteremia. We aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and adverse effects of SAM versus CFZ in patients with BP-MSSA bacteremia. In total, 41 and 30 patients treated with SAM and CFZ, respectively, were identified. The baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. No significant differences were observed in length of hospital stay and all 30-day mortality between the two groups (<i>p</i> = 0.270 and 0.643, respectively). Moreover, no intergroup difference in 90-day mortality was found (hazard ratio 1.02, 95% confidential interval 0.227-4.53). Adverse effects, such as liver dysfunction, were less in the CFZ group than in the SAM group (<i>p</i> = 0.030). Therefore, in cases of poor CFZ supply or in patients allergic to CFZ and penicillinase-stable penicillins, SAM can be an effective therapeutic option for bacteremia due to BP-MSSA with attention of adverse effects, such as liver dysfunction. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a beta-lactamase-producing methicillin-sensitive <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> 
690 |a bacteremia 
690 |a ampicillin/sulbactam 
690 |a cefazolin 
690 |a definitive therapy 
690 |a Japan 
690 |a Therapeutics. Pharmacology 
690 |a RM1-950 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Antibiotics, Vol 11, Iss 11, p 1505 (2022) 
787 0 |n https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/11/11/1505 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2079-6382 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/ca5968978c9e4e36a2685b4d1cc81b9d  |z Connect to this object online.