Accuracy of implant impression using a multifunctional guide in the All-on-Four treatment concept

Introduction: The passivity of prosthetic components is one of the most important prerequisites in oral implant rehabilitation for maintenance of osseointegration. Objective: Thus, the present study analyzed in vitro the accuracy of different molding techniques in prosthetic rehabilitation on angled...

पूर्ण विवरण

में बचाया:
ग्रंथसूची विवरण
मुख्य लेखकों: Juliano de Alencar Vasconcelos (लेखक), Sabrina Maria Castanharo (लेखक), Monica Estefania Tinajero Aroni (लेखक), Raphael Ferreira de Souza Bezerra Araújo (लेखक), Maria Silvia Mauricio Rigolin (लेखक), Lucas Portela Oliveira (लेखक), Francisco de Assis Mollo Júnior (लेखक)
स्वरूप: पुस्तक
प्रकाशित: Editorial Ciencias Médicas, 2020-09-01T00:00:00Z.
विषय:
ऑनलाइन पहुंच:Connect to this object online.
टैग: टैग जोड़ें
कोई टैग नहीं, इस रिकॉर्ड को टैग करने वाले पहले व्यक्ति बनें!
विवरण
सारांश:Introduction: The passivity of prosthetic components is one of the most important prerequisites in oral implant rehabilitation for maintenance of osseointegration. Objective: Thus, the present study analyzed in vitro the accuracy of different molding techniques in prosthetic rehabilitation on angled implants installed in an anatomical model of a metallic edentulous maxilla. Methods: Laboratory experiment study. A reference metal model of an edentulous maxilla was used. A metal framework was used for the misadaptation assessment. Three groups (n= 10) were compared and impressions were made with vinyl-polysiloxane and casts were obtained with type IV stone: (1) Impression with a metallic open-tray without splinted transfers; (2) Impression with a metallic open-tray and metal splinted transfers; (3) Impression with a multifunctional guide and metal splinted transfers. Misadaptation was assessed with the aid of a stereomicroscope and measuring software. Data were submitted to ANOVA with Welch correction and the Games-Howell post-hoc test with the significance set at 5 %. Results: Misadaptation (µm) was 110,23 ± 30,94, 37,53 ± 3,92, and 37,69 ± 2,79 for the the groups. Statistically significant differences between impression with a metallic open-tray with and without splinted transfers were observed (p < 0,001). No significant differences between the other types of impression. Conclusions: Impression with a metallic open-tray without splinted transfers and with a multifunctional guide splinted with metal transfers were the most precise methods resulting in higher accuracy in transferred implants.
वस्तु वर्णन:0034-7507
1561-297X