An analysis of the gifted and non-gifted students' creativity within the context of problem-posing activity<quillbot-extension-portal></quillbot-extension-portal>

The purpose of this study was to examine the mathematical creativity of gifted and non-gifted students through the indicators of creativity (fluency, flexibility, and originality). The study involved 12 secondary school students (six gifted and six non-gifted) from different cities in the Black Sea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Duygu Arabacı (Author), Adnan Baki (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Journal of Pedagogical Research, 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_caec58d80a5e4b1b99471b7997575f9f
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Duygu Arabacı  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Adnan Baki  |e author 
245 0 0 |a An analysis of the gifted and non-gifted students' creativity within the context of problem-posing activity<quillbot-extension-portal></quillbot-extension-portal> 
260 |b Journal of Pedagogical Research,   |c 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2602-3717 
500 |a 10.33902/JPR.202317633 
520 |a The purpose of this study was to examine the mathematical creativity of gifted and non-gifted students through the indicators of creativity (fluency, flexibility, and originality). The study involved 12 secondary school students (six gifted and six non-gifted) from different cities in the Black Sea Region of Türkiye. The data were collected through clinical interviews regarding the solutions developed by the students for a problem-posing activity developed by Balka (1974). Each student was interviewed twice over a two-week period. Prior to the interviews, the students were asked to pose as many different and varied problems as possible. In the clinical interviews, the students' solutions were discussed deeply without evaluating their correctness. Using the theoretical framework developed by Taşkın (2016), data were analyzed using fluency, flexibility, and originality indicators of creativity. The results revealed no clear difference between gifted and non-gifted students in terms of fluency indicators, but gifted students generally pose problems more creatively and flexibly than their non-gifted peers. It has been suggested that problem-posing activities be used to compare the creativity of gifted and non-gifted students. The indicators of originality and flexibility can also be weighted differently for calculating students' final scores of mathematical creativity because they are more effective at distinguishing gifted from non-gifted students.  
546 |a EN 
690 |a mathematical modeling 
690 |a model eliciting activities 
690 |a primary school 
690 |a teaching experiment 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
690 |a Education (General) 
690 |a L7-991 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Pedagogical Research, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 25-52 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://www.ijopr.com/download/an-analysis-of-the-gifted-and-non-gifted-students-creativity-within-the-context-of-problem-posing-12858.pdf 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2602-3717 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/caec58d80a5e4b1b99471b7997575f9f  |z Connect to this object online.