Accuracy of digital panoramic regarding interproximal caries detection

"nBackground and Aims: Conventional radiological equipments in our country are going to be converted to digital system using computed radiology (CR) technology. If we know the accuracy of digital panoramic radiography for detection of small defects in tooth, it will be useful in cases with diff...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Goodarzi Pour D (Author), Nejati S (Author), Fotouhi A (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2011-02-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_cc0e69e3bfbd4e3e9350d615dc769724
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Goodarzi Pour D  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Nejati S  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Fotouhi A  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Accuracy of digital panoramic regarding interproximal caries detection 
260 |b Tehran University of Medical Sciences,   |c 2011-02-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1024-641X 
500 |a 2008-2444 
520 |a "nBackground and Aims: Conventional radiological equipments in our country are going to be converted to digital system using computed radiology (CR) technology. If we know the accuracy of digital panoramic radiography for detection of small defects in tooth, it will be useful in cases with difficulty for taking the intraoral radiographs. The aim of this study was to evaluate sensitivity and specificity of digital panoramic radiography for detection of proximal caries compared with the bitewing radiography."nMaterials and Methods: One-hundred patients who had been ordered for taking both bitewing and panoramic radiography were included in this study. Panoramic and then bitewing radiographs were observed by a maxillofacial radiologist and interproximal caries were recorded. Sensitivity and specificity of digital panoramic radiography (CI=95%) was calculated compared with the bitewing radiography as a gold standard."nResults: This study showed that the values for sensitivity and specificity were 62.7% (CI 95%=57.7%-67.5%) and 91.0% (CI 95%=89.2%-92.5%), respectively."nConclusion: Sensitivity of digital panoramic is less than bitewing radiography even with processing before printing. Therefore, bitewing radiography is superior for detection of inter proximal caries. 
546 |a FA 
690 |a Panoramic radiography 
690 |a Digital radiography 
690 |a Dental caries 
690 |a Medicine 
690 |a R 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Dental Medicine, Vol 24, Iss 1, Pp 36-41 (2011) 
787 0 |n http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/17625.pdf&manuscript_id=17625 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1024-641X 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2008-2444 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/cc0e69e3bfbd4e3e9350d615dc769724  |z Connect to this object online.