C.E. Credit. Artificial Intelligence Applications for the Radiographic Detection of Periodontal Disease: A Scoping Review

ABSTRACTBackground Calculating radiographic bone loss (RBL) can be time-consuming, labor-intensive, and examiner dependent. Artificial intelligence (AI) models have been developed to automate the detection of RBL and the risk of developing periodontal disease and tooth loss. The aim of this scoping...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anne Miller (Author), Chunbo Huang (Author), Erica R. Brody (Author), Rafael Siqueira (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Taylor & Francis Group, 2023-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_cc2362a05c3f49fcbd0c54efe58b11e9
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Anne Miller  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Chunbo Huang  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Erica R. Brody  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Rafael Siqueira  |e author 
245 0 0 |a C.E. Credit. Artificial Intelligence Applications for the Radiographic Detection of Periodontal Disease: A Scoping Review 
260 |b Taylor & Francis Group,   |c 2023-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1080/19424396.2023.2206301 
500 |a 1942-4396 
520 |a ABSTRACTBackground Calculating radiographic bone loss (RBL) can be time-consuming, labor-intensive, and examiner dependent. Artificial intelligence (AI) models have been developed to automate the detection of RBL and the risk of developing periodontal disease and tooth loss. The aim of this scoping review was to identify and evaluate the performance of AI models in diagnosing periodontal disease by detecting RBL.Types of Studies Reviewed Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Dental and Oral Sciences Source, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, ClinicalTrials.gov, and MedRxiv were searched to collect evidence about AI models utilized to detect RBL and diagnosis of periodontal disease. Qualitative analysis was conducted to describe the performance and limitations of AI models for panoramic radiographs, periapical images, and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).Results Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria out of 322 articles identified. Mean accuracy for panoramic radiographic AI models ranged from 63% to 94%. Automated models based on periapical radiographs yielded results ranging from precision as low as 25% for detecting mild disease to a high accuracy of 99% in radiographic bone level staging performance. Periodontal bone loss sensitivity on CBCT ranged from 45% to 72%, while periodontal bone loss specificity was 81% to 83%.Practical Implications AI systems can be a helpful initial approach to screening radiographic images for periodontal disease, given that research shows these diagnostic methods might help provide a more accurate evaluation than examiner review alone. AI models developed for the diagnosis of periodontal disease using RBL require further development to accurately and reliably assess RBL and determine risk of periodontal disease independent of clinician assessment.Continuing Education Credit Available: The practice worksheet is available online in the supplemental material tab for this article.A CDA Continuing Education quiz is online for this article: https://www.cdapresents360.com/learn/catalog/view/20. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Periodontitis 
690 |a artificial intelligence 
690 |a deep learning 
690 |a diagnostic imaging 
690 |a computer-assisted radiographic image interpretation 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of the California Dental Association, Vol 51, Iss 1 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/19424396.2023.2206301 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1942-4396 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/cc2362a05c3f49fcbd0c54efe58b11e9  |z Connect to this object online.