Tools Evaluating Child Oral Health-Related Quality of Life

Objectives: This study aimed to systemically review the tools developed for evaluating oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in preschool children. Methods: Two reviewers systematically searched English-language publications within PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. They screened the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hollis Haotian Chai (Author), Sherry Shiqian Gao (Author), Kitty Jieyi Chen (Author), Edward Chin Man Lo (Author), Duangporn Duangthip (Author), Chun Hung Chu (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Elsevier, 2024-02-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_cc357a4721624f68a77a1c06ff7d6e92
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Hollis Haotian Chai  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Sherry Shiqian Gao  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Kitty Jieyi Chen  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Edward Chin Man Lo  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Duangporn Duangthip  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Chun Hung Chu  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Tools Evaluating Child Oral Health-Related Quality of Life 
260 |b Elsevier,   |c 2024-02-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0020-6539 
500 |a 10.1016/j.identj.2023.07.004 
520 |a Objectives: This study aimed to systemically review the tools developed for evaluating oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in preschool children. Methods: Two reviewers systematically searched English-language publications within PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. They screened the titles and abstracts and retrieved the full texts of the selected publications. Studies which developed, validated, or culturally adapted an OHRQoL tool used in preschool children were included. They recorded information regarding tool characteristics, item configuration, discriminative validation, the aim of assessment, and the target group. Results: The study included 59 publications and identified 12 tools for assessing OHRQoL in preschool children. Seven tools were tailored for preschool ages. Most of the scales were generic oral health measures. Dental caries was the most commonly used oral condition for assessing a tool's discriminative validity. Eight tools required parental proxy reports. Three tools were both child-administrated and parent-administrated. One tool was designed to be answered solely by children. Ten tools assessed the oral health-related impact on children, including oral condition-related, functioning, environmental, and emotional/social domains. Four tools included items regarding the impact on both children and family. Conclusions: This review identified 12 tools developed for evaluating OHRQoL in preschool children, 7 of which were tailored for preschool age. The 12 tools were validated but incomprehensive due to the subjective and multidimensional nature of the OHRQoL concept. Researchers can choose a suitable tool for their studies by understanding the basic characteristics and item setting of the tools. Researchers can have an overview of the tools developed for evaluating OHRQoL in preschool children. They can use the findings from this review to choose a suitable tool for their studies regarding the OHRQoL in preschool children. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Caries 
690 |a Children 
690 |a Childhood 
690 |a Oral health 
690 |a Quality of life 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n International Dental Journal, Vol 74, Iss 1, Pp 15-24 (2024) 
787 0 |n http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020653923001211 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0020-6539 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/cc357a4721624f68a77a1c06ff7d6e92  |z Connect to this object online.