Training Load and Match-Play Performance in Collegiate Division I Basketball

Purpose: This study examined the relationship between training load and match-play team performance in the subsequent game. Methods: Training load for a NCAA Division I Basketball team was tracked over a 3-year period; 225 practices were observed and recorded. Training load was classified as total d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Adam Petway (Author)
Format: Book
Published: International Universities Strength and Conditioning Association, 2022-04-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_cc4de2b10c114016bc4e3e38e44abfd7
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Adam Petway  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Training Load and Match-Play Performance in Collegiate Division I Basketball 
260 |b International Universities Strength and Conditioning Association,   |c 2022-04-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.47206/ijsc.v2i1.114 
500 |a 2634-2235 
520 |a Purpose: This study examined the relationship between training load and match-play team performance in the subsequent game. Methods: Training load for a NCAA Division I Basketball team was tracked over a 3-year period; 225 practices were observed and recorded. Training load was classified as total duration of training and duration of full-court 5-versus-5 (5v5) during training. In-game performance was tracked for 92 matches during this period. Training load was organized into 48-hours prior to competition (MD-2), 24-hours prior to competition (MD-1), Total Duration, Average Duration, Totals 5v5, and Average 5v5. Performance was determined on how the team faired against the closing point spread differential (CPSD). If the team performed above the CPSD it was considered an ABOVE performance, whereas if the team performed below the CPSD it was considered BELOW. A linear mixed model was used to assess the differences between ABOVE and BELOW performances. Cohen's d effect sizes (ES) were calculated to determine the magnitude of the differences. Results: Statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. Both 5v5 MD-1 (p = 0.03; ES = -0.43) and Average 5v5 (p = 0.01; ES = -0.55) leading into matches was significantly greater for BELOW than ABOVE outcomes. Conclusion: 5v5 MD-1 and the Average 5v5 in preparation for competition had a significant impact on ensuing performances, whereas no significant difference was found in training MD-2. These findings could have implications on the sequencing of training sessions leading into competition.   Keywords: basketball training; team sports; duration; team performance; points spread     
546 |a EN 
690 |a Sports 
690 |a GV557-1198.995 
690 |a Sports medicine 
690 |a RC1200-1245 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n International Journal of Strength and Conditioning, Vol 2, Iss 1 (2022) 
787 0 |n https://journal.iusca.org/index.php/Journal/article/view/114 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2634-2235 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/cc4de2b10c114016bc4e3e38e44abfd7  |z Connect to this object online.