Iranian L2 Researchers' Perspectives on Research Ethics

This study aims at exploring L2 researchers' perspectives on research ethics in Iran. A total of ten teacher researchers were selected among a larger group of researchers based on the criteria of academic degree and familiarity with research principles. They were interviewed about different asp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhila Gharaveisi (Author), Adel Dastgoshadeh (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Asociación Colombiana de Profesores de Ingles, 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_cc67b9d6e5f94ab19b8cad2f79dc97ee
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Zhila Gharaveisi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Adel Dastgoshadeh  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Iranian L2 Researchers' Perspectives on Research Ethics 
260 |b Asociación Colombiana de Profesores de Ingles,   |c 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a https://doi.org/10.19183/how.27.1.474 
500 |a 0120-5927 
500 |a 0120-5927 
520 |a This study aims at exploring L2 researchers' perspectives on research ethics in Iran. A total of ten teacher researchers were selected among a larger group of researchers based on the criteria of academic degree and familiarity with research principles. They were interviewed about different aspects of research ethics. Their responses were audio-recorded and transcribed by the researcher. Finally, the emerging themes were extracted from the responses which showed plagiarism, data management, participant rights, and authorship rights as the most frequent themes discussed by the respondents. Furthermore, the extent of the participants' self-expressed adherence to ethical considerations in research was differential, ranging from a minimum amount of adherence to an acceptable degree of adherence and commitment to research ethics. In addition, the results showed that not all participants had a clear understanding and definition of the four major themes which emerged from the results. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a research ethics 
690 |a perspectives of ethics 
690 |a adherence 
690 |a themes of ethics 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
690 |a Theory and practice of education 
690 |a LB5-3640 
690 |a English language 
690 |a PE1-3729 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n HOW, Vol 27, Iss 1, Pp 103-120 (2020) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.19183/how.27.1.474 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0120-5927 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0120-5927 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/cc67b9d6e5f94ab19b8cad2f79dc97ee  |z Connect to this object online.