The 2004 Claremont Debate: Lipsey vs. Scriven
While there is little disagreement about the need for, and value of, program evaluation, there remain major disagreements in the field about best practices. An exchange about the role of randomized control trials in program evaluation practice in educational settings set the stage for the 2004 Clare...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Stewart I. Donaldson (Author), Christina A. Christie (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
The Evaluation Center at Western Michigan University,
2005-10-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
The 2009 Claremont Debates: The Promise and Pitfalls of Utilization-Focused and Empowerment Evaluation
by: Stewart I. Donaldson, et al.
Published: (2010) -
The Importance of Conceptualizing Evaluation as a Transdiscipline: Honoring Michael Scriven's Legacy
by: Stewart Donaldson
Published: (2024) -
The 2009 Claremont Debates-Appendix A: David Fetterman's PowerPoint Slides
by: David M. Fetterman
Published: (2010) -
What's in a Scriven Number?
by: Abhik R. Roy, et al.
Published: (2012) -
Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation
by: Brandon W. Youker
Published: (2024)