Do the UK government's new Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) scores adequately measure primary care performance? A cross-sectional survey of routine healthcare data
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>General practitioners' remuneration is now linked directly to the scores attained in the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF). The success of this approach depends in part on designing a robust and clinically meaningful set of i...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Keen Justin (Author), Tu Yu-Kang (Author), Cheng Yaping (Author), Rudge Gavin (Author), Downing Amy (Author), Gilthorpe Mark S (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
BMC,
2007-10-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Financiamento para medicina de família na próxima década: vida após o QOF
by: Mark Ashworth, et al.
Published: (2017) -
The most dangerous hospital or the most dangerous equation?
by: Tu Yu-Kang, et al.
Published: (2007) -
The impact of the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) on the recording of smoking targets in primary care medical records: cross-sectional analyses from The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database
by: Taggar Jaspal S, et al.
Published: (2012) -
Combining QOF data with the care bundle approach may provide a more meaningful measure of quality in general practice
by: de Wet Carl, et al.
Published: (2012) -
Governments are legally obliged to ensure adequate access to health information
by: Soumyadeep Bhaumik, et al.
Published: (2013)