Evaluation of a nursing doctoral program from the perspective of Students, Alumni, and Faculty: A Quality-Oriented approach
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the quality of the nursing doctoral program features as perceived by students, alumni, and faculty, and to test for significant differences among them. The study was guided by Wulff's Alignment Model. Methods: A cross-sectional design was used. Data were collec...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Elsevier,
2023-01-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_cf014d8af7b6459583dbd894190dbdf7 | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Huda M. Atiyeh |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Manar M. Nabolsi |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Laila M. Akhu-Zaheya |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Huthaifah Khrais |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Mohammad Alsadi |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Abdulqadir J. Nashwan |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Evaluation of a nursing doctoral program from the perspective of Students, Alumni, and Faculty: A Quality-Oriented approach |
260 | |b Elsevier, |c 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a 2214-1391 | ||
500 | |a 10.1016/j.ijans.2023.100622 | ||
520 | |a Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the quality of the nursing doctoral program features as perceived by students, alumni, and faculty, and to test for significant differences among them. The study was guided by Wulff's Alignment Model. Methods: A cross-sectional design was used. Data were collected from 96 participants using an online survey, which utilized the program domain from the global, formative assessment measure - the Quality of Nursing Doctoral Education questionnaire. Results: Overall, the faculty and alumni rated the program features more positively than the students. Significant differences were found in areas such as the program mission, research relevant issues, supportive learning environment, components of core courses, and post-doctoral issues. Conclusions: Utilizing the formative assessment measure to evaluate the quality of nursing doctoral program features from the perspectives of students, alumni, and faculty highlighted areas of disagreement. The revealed information provides opportunities for improving the program's quality. Involving other stakeholders, such as program managers and decision-makers, would offer a more holistic view of the program's quality evaluation. | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
690 | |a Education outcomes | ||
690 | |a Doctoral nursing program | ||
690 | |a Quality education | ||
690 | |a Higher education | ||
690 | |a Quality model | ||
690 | |a History of Africa | ||
690 | |a DT1-3415 | ||
690 | |a Nursing | ||
690 | |a RT1-120 | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences, Vol 19, Iss , Pp 100622- (2023) | |
787 | 0 | |n http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214139123000975 | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/2214-1391 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/cf014d8af7b6459583dbd894190dbdf7 |z Connect to this object online. |