The reciprocal jaw-muscle reflexes elicited by anterior- and back-tooth-contacts-a perspective to explain the control of the masticatory muscles

Abstract Aims Tooth-contact sensations are considered essential to boost jaw adductor muscles during mastication. However, no previous studies have explained the importance of the inhibitory reflex of human anterior-tooth (ANT)-contacts in mastication. Here I present the "reciprocal reflex-cont...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lauri Vaahtoniemi (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Nature Publishing Group, 2020-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_cf0561daa45e47c6a5e17a8625f2ae97
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Lauri Vaahtoniemi  |e author 
245 0 0 |a The reciprocal jaw-muscle reflexes elicited by anterior- and back-tooth-contacts-a perspective to explain the control of the masticatory muscles 
260 |b Nature Publishing Group,   |c 2020-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1038/s41405-020-00056-z 
500 |a 2056-807X 
520 |a Abstract Aims Tooth-contact sensations are considered essential to boost jaw adductor muscles during mastication. However, no previous studies have explained the importance of the inhibitory reflex of human anterior-tooth (ANT)-contacts in mastication. Here I present the "reciprocal reflex-control-hypothesis" of mammalian mastication. Subjects and setting of the study I demonstrate the hypothesis with the live kinematics of free jaw-closures as inferred from T-Scan recordings of dental patients. Results The jaw-closures started with negligible force, predominantly with ANT-contacts (the AF-bites). The first ANT-contact inhibited the first kinematic tilt of the mandible, whereas the bites starting from a back-tooth (BAT)-contact (the BF-bites) accelerated the first tilt. The second tilt established a low-force static tripod of the ANT- and bilateral BAT-contacts for a fixed mandible-maxilla relation. Thereafter, semi-static bite force increased rapidly, relatively more in the BAT-area. Discussion and Conclusions In the vertical-closure phase of chewing, the primate joint-fulcrum (class 3 lever) conflicts with the food-bolus-fulcrum in the BAT-area (class 1 lever). The resilient class 3 and 1 lever systems are superseded by an almost static mechanically more advantageous class 2 lever with a more rigid fulcrum at the most anterior ANT-contact. For humans, the class 2 levered delivery of force also enables forceful horizontal food grinding to be extended widely to the BAT-area. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BDJ Open, Vol 6, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2020) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-020-00056-z 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2056-807X 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/cf0561daa45e47c6a5e17a8625f2ae97  |z Connect to this object online.