Please tick the appropriate box: Perspectives on patient reported experience

Patient experience surveys are increasingly used as a method for evaluating important aspects of quality of care and the results are used politically to support general decision-making. However, there have been limited attempts to summarize the newest and most essential knowledge on how to measure a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mette Sandager (Author), Morten Freil (Author), Janne Knudsen (Author)
Format: Book
Published: The Beryl Institute, 2016-04-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_cf9a60d24b634903bb9ccaef2bc2193c
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Mette Sandager  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Morten Freil  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Janne Knudsen  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Please tick the appropriate box: Perspectives on patient reported experience 
260 |b The Beryl Institute,   |c 2016-04-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2372-0247 
520 |a Patient experience surveys are increasingly used as a method for evaluating important aspects of quality of care and the results are used politically to support general decision-making. However, there have been limited attempts to summarize the newest and most essential knowledge on how to measure and interpret patient experience data. This paper aims to summarize knowledge on the association between delivered care and patient reported experience and the factors influencing this association, and to outline a conceptual model illustrating the association. The method employed is integrative literature review. Quantitative and qualitative studies as well as theoretical and discussion papers that specifically related to the concept of patient evaluations were included. Identified literature was scoped. Thematic analysis was conducted and the results were used to synthesize a model by integrating identified factors. Expectations, patient characteristics, survey timing, loyalty to health professionals, backing up own choices and questionnaire and item design where identified as factors influencing the association between delivered care and patient reported experience. The developed model suggests that there should be a clear differentiation between patient's experience and patient reported experience. The model derived from the literature underlines that the association between received care and patient reported experience is complex. Patient reported experience data should be interpreted with caution, as reported positive experiences might neither reflect high quality care nor satisfied patients. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a patient experience 
690 |a patient reported experience 
690 |a measurement 
690 |a model 
690 |a Medicine (General) 
690 |a R5-920 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Patient Experience Journal (2016) 
787 0 |n https://pxjournal.org/journal/vol3/iss1/10 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2372-0247 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/cf9a60d24b634903bb9ccaef2bc2193c  |z Connect to this object online.