Strategies for Accessible Breast Screening for People With Intellectual Disability

Introduction: People with intellectual disability are less likely to participate in breast screening than people without intellectual disability. They experience a range of barriers to accessing breast screening, however, there is no consensus on strategies to overcome these barriers. Our objective...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Janelle Weise (Author), Rachael Cvejic (Author), Julian Trollor (Author)
Format: Book
Published: SAGE Publishing, 2024-05-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_d0b0c732b4a14f03b4592b181a4a1e2b
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Janelle Weise  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Rachael Cvejic  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Julian Trollor  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Strategies for Accessible Breast Screening for People With Intellectual Disability 
260 |b SAGE Publishing,   |c 2024-05-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2150-1327 
500 |a 10.1177/21501319241251938 
520 |a Introduction: People with intellectual disability are less likely to participate in breast screening than people without intellectual disability. They experience a range of barriers to accessing breast screening, however, there is no consensus on strategies to overcome these barriers. Our objective was to reach consensus on the strategies required for accessible breast screening for people with intellectual disability. Methods: Fourteen experts participated in a modified on-line Delphi that used Levesque's model of health care access as the theoretical framework. At the end of each round descriptive and thematic analyses were completed. Data was then triangulated to determine if consensus was reached. Results: After 3 rounds, 9 strategies were modified, 24 strategies were added and consensus was reached for 52 strategies across the 5 dimensions of access. Key areas of action related to (i) decision making and consent, (ii) accessible information, (iii) engagement of peer mentors, (iv) service navigators, and (v) equipping key stakeholders. Conclusions: The resulting strategies are the first to articulate how to make breast screening accessible and can be used to inform health policy and quality improvement practices. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics 
690 |a R858-859.7 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Primary Care & Community Health, Vol 15 (2024) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319241251938 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2150-1327 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/d0b0c732b4a14f03b4592b181a4a1e2b  |z Connect to this object online.