Understanding Health Professional Responses to Service Disinvestment: A Qualitative Study

Background<br /> Disinvestment from inefficient health services may be a potential solution to rising healthcare costs, but there has been poor uptake of disinvestment recommendations. This Australian study aims to understand how health professionals react when confronted with a plan to disinv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Deb Mitchell (Author), Lisa O'Brien (Author), Anne Bardoel (Author), Terry Haines (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Kerman University of Medical Sciences, 2019-07-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_d0f4c7a3d54b49bfbd5bd6ad814b5379
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Deb Mitchell  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Lisa O'Brien  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Anne Bardoel  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Terry Haines  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Understanding Health Professional Responses to Service Disinvestment: A Qualitative Study 
260 |b Kerman University of Medical Sciences,   |c 2019-07-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2322-5939 
500 |a 2322-5939 
500 |a 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.20 
520 |a Background<br /> Disinvestment from inefficient health services may be a potential solution to rising healthcare costs, but there has been poor uptake of disinvestment recommendations. This Australian study aims to understand how health professionals react when confronted with a plan to disinvest from a health service they previously provided to their patients.<br />  <br /> Methods<br /> This qualitative study took place prior to the disinvestment phase of a trial which removed weekend allied health services from acute hospital wards, to evaluate the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the service. Observations and focus groups were used to collect data from 156 participants which was analysed thematically.<br />  <br /> Results<br /> Initial reactions to the disinvestment were almost universally negative, with staff extremely concerned about the impact on the safety and quality of patient care and planning ways to circumvent the trial. Removal of existing services was perceived as a loss and created a direct threat to some clinicians' professional identity. With time, discussion, and understanding of the project's context, some staff moved towards acceptance and perceived the trial as an opportunity, particularly given the service was to be reinstated after the disinvestment.<br />  <br /> Conclusion<br /> Clinicians and health service managers are protective of the services they deliver and can create barriers to disinvestment. Even when services are removed to ascertain their value, health professionals may continue to provide services to their patients. Measuring the impact of the disinvestment may assist staff to accept the removal of a service. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a disinvestment 
690 |a staff reactions 
690 |a weekend allied health services 
690 |a service change 
690 |a healthcare 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n International Journal of Health Policy and Management, Vol 8, Iss 7, Pp 403-411 (2019) 
787 0 |n https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3610_26797f3fa8a81fc6feb9bb7242d7eb11.pdf 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2322-5939 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2322-5939 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/d0f4c7a3d54b49bfbd5bd6ad814b5379  |z Connect to this object online.