Evaluation of patients´ perspective on a multimorbidity patient-centered care model piloted in the chilean public health system

Abstract Background The progressive multimorbidity explosion has challenged Chile's health systems and worldwide. The Centro de Innovación en Salud ANCORA UC implemented a new Multimorbidity Patient-Centered Care Model in Chile. Objective Evaluate the perspective of high-risk patients about th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jaime C. Sapag (Author), Mayra Martínez (Author), Paula Zamorano (Author), Teresita Varela (Author), Álvaro Téllez (Author), Esteban Irazoqui (Author), Paulina Muñoz (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2023-11-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_d0f6ed5af3ff427a8b3f4a8bf21c73f4
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Jaime C. Sapag  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mayra Martínez  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Paula Zamorano  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Teresita Varela  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Álvaro Téllez  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Esteban Irazoqui  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Paulina Muñoz  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Evaluation of patients´ perspective on a multimorbidity patient-centered care model piloted in the chilean public health system 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2023-11-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s12889-023-17220-3 
500 |a 1471-2458 
520 |a Abstract Background The progressive multimorbidity explosion has challenged Chile's health systems and worldwide. The Centro de Innovación en Salud ANCORA UC implemented a new Multimorbidity Patient-Centered Care Model in Chile. Objective Evaluate the perspective of high-risk patients about the core elements of the model. Methodology We conducted a cross sectional telephone-based survey that considered the application of a 13 items questionnaire. Of them, nine were Likert scale questions with scores from 1 to 7, one dichotomic question, and three open-ended questions. 231 high-risk patients who received care through the model at primary care centers participated in the study. Quantitative data were encoded, consolidated, and analyzed with the SPSS software. We performed descriptive and analytic statistics techniques to assess different variables and their potential associations. Thematic analysis was conducted for qualitative data. Results The overall score was 5.84 (range: 1 to 7), with a standard deviation of 1.25. Questions with the best scores were those related with personalized care and the primary care teams. The lowest scored was for the item regarding the continuity of care between primary nurses and inpatient care at the hospital. There was a difference in patient outcomes depending on their health center. Regarding sociodemographic characteristics, age did not significantly affect the results. Conclusions The study reveals the perceptions about a complex multimorbidity intervention from the patient's perspective. It complements the impact on health services utilization evaluation that supports decision-makers currently scaling up a similar strategy in our country and could be considered in other countries dealing with non-communicable diseases. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Multimorbidity 
690 |a Patient 
690 |a Perspective 
690 |a High-risk 
690 |a Implementation 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BMC Public Health, Vol 23, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17220-3 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2458 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/d0f6ed5af3ff427a8b3f4a8bf21c73f4  |z Connect to this object online.