Filed and granted Indian Patents in dentistry from 2005-2009: A critical analysis and review

Background: Patent policies have proved to be extremely important for several countries to develop. India has achieved its global status since 2005; a critical analysis of the patents at IPO will help us to identify the potential, available for patents with Indian Dental Fraternity. Aim: The aim of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammed Nadeem Ahmed Bijle (Author), Shankargouda Patil (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2013-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_d11ece4cc93e453eb516dd456df965b0
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Mohammed Nadeem Ahmed Bijle  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Shankargouda Patil  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Filed and granted Indian Patents in dentistry from 2005-2009: A critical analysis and review 
260 |b Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications,   |c 2013-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0970-9290 
500 |a 1998-3603 
500 |a 10.4103/0970-9290.123425 
520 |a Background: Patent policies have proved to be extremely important for several countries to develop. India has achieved its global status since 2005; a critical analysis of the patents at IPO will help us to identify the potential, available for patents with Indian Dental Fraternity. Aim: The aim of this study is to critically analyze and review Indian Patents in the field of Dentistry from 2005-2009 for evaluation of status of Indian Patents in Dentistry. Materials and Methods: A total of 110 patents were scrutinized from 2005-2009 available by IPO on www.patentoffice.nic.in. Following which a preliminary data were collected from individual patents and recorded in a record sheet. Statistical Analysis: The data collected were analyzed using SPSS 16.0 software and were subjected to ANOVA test. Results: All patents scrutinized were applied for dental materials (100%). Company applicants (70%) were the maximum followed by the individual applicants (27.2%). A total of 87.3% of patents had enrolled for International Application. Priority country had maximum favor with USA (39.2%) followed by Europe (36.1%). Single inventors (44.5%) were the maximum followed by two inventors (22.7%). Europe (37.3%) had the maximum first inventor, followed by United States of America (30%) and India (10.9%). Individual inventors were maximum in Europe (38.8%) followed by USA (20.4%) and India (16.3%). Conclusion: Contribution from Indian Nationals as inventors for patents in the field of Dentistry is limited, thus reducing the pace of progress and development. Indian inventors in the field of Dentistry have to go a long way to compete with the fellow mates of developed countries like USA and Europe. Continuing Dental Education programs on Intellectual property rights should be conducted on regular basis especially for Dentist's involved in research. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Analysis 
690 |a dentistry 
690 |a intellectual property rights 
690 |a patents 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Indian Journal of Dental Research, Vol 24, Iss 5, Pp 646-646 (2013) 
787 0 |n http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2013;volume=24;issue=5;spage=646;epage=646;aulast=Bijle 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0970-9290 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1998-3603 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/d11ece4cc93e453eb516dd456df965b0  |z Connect to this object online.