The DISCO App: A pilot test of a multi-level intervention to reduce the financial burden of cancer through improved cost communication

Objective: Financial toxicity affects 30-50% of people with cancer in the US. Although experts recommend patients and physicians discuss treatment cost, cost discussions occur infrequently. We pilot-tested the feasibility, acceptability and influence on outcomes of the DIScussions of COst (DISCO) Ap...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lauren M. Hamel (Author), David W. Dougherty (Author), Theresa A. Hastert (Author), Erlene K. Seymour (Author), Seongho Kim (Author), Hadeel Assad (Author), Jasminder Phalore (Author), Roger Soulliere (Author), Susan Eggly (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Elsevier, 2022-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective: Financial toxicity affects 30-50% of people with cancer in the US. Although experts recommend patients and physicians discuss treatment cost, cost discussions occur infrequently. We pilot-tested the feasibility, acceptability and influence on outcomes of the DIScussions of COst (DISCO) App, a multi-level communication intervention designed to improve cost discussions and related outcomes. Methods: While waiting to see their physician, patients (n = 32) used the DISCO App on a tablet. Physicians were given a cost discussion tip sheet. Clinic visits were video recorded and patients completed pre- and post-intervention measures of self-efficacy for managing costs, self-efficacy for interacting with physicians, cost-related distress, and perceptions of the DISCO App. Coders observed the recordings to determine the presence of cost discussions, initiators, and topics. Results: Most patients reported needing ≤15 min to use the DISCO App, and that it made it easier to ask cost-related questions. Findings showed increased self-efficacy for managing treatment costs (p = .02) and for interacting with physicians (p = .001). All visits included a cost discussion. Conclusions: Prompting patients to discuss costs may improve cost treatment discussions and related outcomes. Innovation: An app-based and tailorable treatment-cost communication intervention is feasible, acceptable, and demonstrates promise in prompting cost discussions and improving outcomes.Trial registration: Clinical Trials.gov registration number: NCT03676920 (September 19, 2018).
Item Description:2772-6282
10.1016/j.pecinn.2021.100002