Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence-assisted caries detection: a clinical evaluation

Abstract Objective This clinical study aimed to evaluate the practical value of integrating an AI diagnostic model into clinical practice for caries detection using intraoral images. Methods In this prospective study, 4,361 teeth from 191 consecutive patients visiting an endodontics clinic were exam...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jing-Wen Zhang (Author), Jie Fan (Author), Fang-Bing Zhao (Author), Bing'er Ma (Author), Xiao-Qing Shen (Author), Yuan-Ming Geng (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2024-09-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_d16baf5cf39c4443a366cc4e4fb54592
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Jing-Wen Zhang  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jie Fan  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Fang-Bing Zhao  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Bing'er Ma  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Xiao-Qing Shen  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Yuan-Ming Geng  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence-assisted caries detection: a clinical evaluation 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2024-09-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s12903-024-04847-w 
500 |a 1472-6831 
520 |a Abstract Objective This clinical study aimed to evaluate the practical value of integrating an AI diagnostic model into clinical practice for caries detection using intraoral images. Methods In this prospective study, 4,361 teeth from 191 consecutive patients visiting an endodontics clinic were examined using an intraoral camera. The AI model, combining MobileNet-v3 and U-net architectures, was used for caries detection. The diagnostic performance of the AI model was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy, with the clinical diagnosis by endodontic specialists as the reference standard. Results The overall accuracy of the AI-assisted caries detection was 93.40%. The sensitivity and specificity were 81.31% (95% CI 78.22%-84.06%) and 95.65% (95% CI 94.94%-96.26%), respectively. The NPV and PPV were 96.49% (95% CI 95.84%-97.04%) and 77.68% (95% CI 74.49%-80.58%), respectively. The diagnostic accuracy varied depending on tooth position and caries type, with the highest accuracy in anterior teeth (96.04%) and the lowest sensitivity for interproximal caries in anterior teeth and buccal caries in premolars (approximately 10%). Conclusion The AI-assisted caries detection tool demonstrated potential for clinical application, with high overall accuracy and specificity. However, the sensitivity varied considerably depending on tooth position and caries type, suggesting the need for further improvement. Integration of multimodal data and development of more advanced AI models may enhance the performance of AI-assisted caries detection in clinical practice. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Dental caries 
690 |a Artificial intelligence 
690 |a Intraoral camera 
690 |a Diagnostic test 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BMC Oral Health, Vol 24, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2024) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04847-w 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1472-6831 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/d16baf5cf39c4443a366cc4e4fb54592  |z Connect to this object online.