Nivolumab Versus Sorafenib as First-Line Therapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Objective: Nivolumab improves overall survival (OS) and is associated with fewer adverse events than sorafenib for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC). However, the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab compared with sorafenib treatment for aHCC remains unclear. This study evaluated...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Yan Li (Author), Xueyan Liang (Author), Huijuan Li (Author), Tong Yang (Author), Sitong Guo (Author), Xiaoyu Chen (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.,
2022-07-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Tislelizumab versus sorafenib as first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis
by: Zhiwei Zheng, et al.
Published: (2024) -
Sintilimab Plus Bevacizumab Biosimilar Versus Sorafenib as First-Line Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
by: Ye Peng, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Cost-Effectiveness of Nivolumab Plus Cabozantinib Versus Sunitinib as a First-Line Treatment for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma in the United States
by: SiNi Li, et al.
Published: (2021) -
The Cost Effectiveness of Donafenib Compared With Sorafenib for the First-Line Treatment of Unresectable or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma in China
by: Rui Meng, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Efficacy and Safety of Sorafenib Versus Supportive Care in Egyptian Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients
by: Noha Salah El Baghdady, et al.
Published: (2020)