A Method to Explore the Best Mixed-Effects Model in a Data-Driven Manner with Multiprocessing: Applications in Public Health Research

In the present study, I developed and tested an R module to explore the best models within the context of multilevel modeling in research in public health. The module that I developed, <i>explore.models</i>, compares all possible candidate models generated from a set of candidate predict...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hyemin Han (Author)
Format: Book
Published: MDPI AG, 2024-05-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_d1e3892c7d2849c4a905a58a9a40028f
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Hyemin Han  |e author 
245 0 0 |a A Method to Explore the Best Mixed-Effects Model in a Data-Driven Manner with Multiprocessing: Applications in Public Health Research 
260 |b MDPI AG,   |c 2024-05-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.3390/ejihpe14050088 
500 |a 2254-9625 
500 |a 2174-8144 
520 |a In the present study, I developed and tested an R module to explore the best models within the context of multilevel modeling in research in public health. The module that I developed, <i>explore.models</i>, compares all possible candidate models generated from a set of candidate predictors with information criteria, Akaike information criterion (AIC), and Bayesian information criterion (BIC), with multiprocessing. For testing, I ran <i>explore.models</i> with datasets analyzed in three previous studies in public health, which assumed candidate models with different degrees of model complexity. These three studies examined the predictors of psychological well-being, compliance with preventive measures, and vaccine intent during the COVID-19 pandemic. After conducting model exploration with <i>explore.models</i>, I cross-validated the nomination results with calculated model Bayes Factors to examine whether the model exploration was performed accurately. The results suggest that <i>explore.models</i> using AIC and BIC can nominate best candidate models and such nomination outcomes are supported by the calculated model Bayes Factors. In particular, all the identified models are superior to the full models in terms of model Bayes Factors. Also, by employing AIC and BIC with multiprocessing, <i>explore.models</i> requires a shorter processing time than model Bayes Factor calculations. These results indicate that <i>explore.models</i> is a reliable, valid, and feasible tool to conduct data-driven model exploration with datasets collected from multiple groups in research on health psychology and education. 
546 |a EN 
546 |a ES 
690 |a data science 
690 |a data-driven analysis 
690 |a model exploration 
690 |a mixed-effects model 
690 |a public health 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
690 |a Psychology 
690 |a BF1-990 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, Vol 14, Iss 5, Pp 1338-1350 (2024) 
787 0 |n https://www.mdpi.com/2254-9625/14/5/88 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2174-8144 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2254-9625 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/d1e3892c7d2849c4a905a58a9a40028f  |z Connect to this object online.