Effectiveness of en masse versus two-step retraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract Background This review aims to compare the effectiveness of en masse and two-step retraction methods during orthodontic space closure regarding anchorage preservation and anterior segment retraction and to assess their effect on the duration of treatment and root resorption. Methods An elec...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Mumen Z. Rizk (Author), Hisham Mohammed (Author), Omar Ismael (Author), David R. Bearn (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
SpringerOpen,
2018-01-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Role of anatomical sites and correlated risk factors on the survival of orthodontic miniscrew implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
by: Hisham Mohammed, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Evaluation of treatment outcomes of en masse retraction with temporary skeletal anchorage devices in comparison with two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with dentoalveolar protrusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis
by: Hanin Nizar Khlef, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Effectiveness of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices in canine retraction and anchorage preservation during the two-step technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis
by: Haonan Tian, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Efficacy of orthodontic mini implants for en masse retraction in the maxilla: a systematic review and meta-analysis
by: Kathrin Becker, et al.
Published: (2018) -
RETRACTED: Screen Time and Body Mass Index Among Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by: Yiling Wu, et al.
Published: (2022)