Intramuscular compared to intravenous midazolam for paediatric sedation: A study on cardiopulmonary safety and effectiveness

Background: Sedation in children remains a controversial issue in emergency departments (ED). Midazolam, as a benzodiazepine is widely used for procedural sedation among paediatrics. We compared the effectiveness and safety of two forms of midazolam prescription; intramuscular (IM) and intravenous (...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad-Reza Ghane (Author), Hamid-Reza Javadzadeh (Author), Sadrollah Mahmoudi (Author), Bita Najafian (Author), Amin Saburi (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2014-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_d29a1581d26f429da50a1aa81e43f1f5
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Mohammad-Reza Ghane  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Hamid-Reza Javadzadeh  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Sadrollah Mahmoudi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Bita Najafian  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Amin Saburi  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Intramuscular compared to intravenous midazolam for paediatric sedation: A study on cardiopulmonary safety and effectiveness 
260 |b Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications,   |c 2014-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0189-6725 
500 |a 0974-5998 
500 |a 10.4103/0189-6725.137329 
520 |a Background: Sedation in children remains a controversial issue in emergency departments (ED). Midazolam, as a benzodiazepine is widely used for procedural sedation among paediatrics. We compared the effectiveness and safety of two forms of midazolam prescription; intramuscular (IM) and intravenous (IV). Patients and Methods: A cohort study was conducted on two matched groups of 30 children referred to our ED between 2010 and 2011. The first group received IM midazolam (0.3 mg/kg) and the second group received IV midazolam (0.15 mg/kg) for sedation. For evaluating effectiveness, sedation, irritation and cooperation score were followed every 15 min for 60 min and for safety assessment, vital signs and O 2 saturation were observed. Results: Mean age was 6.18 ± 2.88 years and 31 patients (51.7%) were male. All patients were sedated completely after using first dose. There was an overall complication rate of 68.3%. 35 (58.3%) patients presented euphoria as the most common complication, but there was no statistical difference between the two groups (P = 0.396). Cases who received IV midazolam became sedated faster than those received IM midazolam (P > 0.001). The vital signs including heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure and O 2 saturation changed significantly between and within groups during the sedation (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Both forms of midazolam, IM and IV, are effective and safe for paediatric sedation in ED. Although the sedative with IV form might appear sooner, IM form of midazolam can be effectively used in patient with limited IV access. Patients are better to observe closely for psychological side-effects. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Midazolam 
690 |a safety 
690 |a sedation 
690 |a Pediatrics 
690 |a RJ1-570 
690 |a Surgery 
690 |a RD1-811 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n African Journal of Paediatric Surgery, Vol 11, Iss 3, Pp 219-224 (2014) 
787 0 |n http://www.afrjpaedsurg.org/article.asp?issn=0189-6725;year=2014;volume=11;issue=3;spage=219;epage=224;aulast=Ghane 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0189-6725 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0974-5998 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/d29a1581d26f429da50a1aa81e43f1f5  |z Connect to this object online.