Randomized double-blind trial comparing effects of low-flow vs high-flow anesthesia on postoperative lung functions using respirometer
Background and Aims: Modern anesthetic practice utilizes low-flow anesthesia with evolving evidence on its pulmonary effects. Studies comparing measurement of vital capacity and inspiratory reserve volume using respirometer in both low-flow and high-flow anesthesia are sparse. We evaluated the effec...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | T Krishna Prasad (Author), N Gnanasekar (Author), K Soundarya Priyadharsini (Author), Robin Sajan Chacko (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications,
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Ropivacaine with fentanyl versus bupivacaine with fentanyl for caudal epidural in pediatric infraumbilical surgeries - A prospective randomized double-blinded trial
by: S Divya, et al.
Published: (2023) -
Low flow anesthesia and volatile anesthetic agents - Concerns
by: Rakesh Garg
Published: (2012) -
Comparison of dexamethasone, granisetron and haloperidol in prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting following laparoscopic surgeries: A prospective, double-blinded study
by: Shikha Sharma, et al.
Published: (2019) -
Low and minimal flow anesthesia: Angels dancing on the point of a needle
by: George Mychaskiw
Published: (2012) -
Duration of postoperative analgesia with Nalbuphine vs Butorphanol as an adjunct to spinal anesthesia for lower limb orthopedic surgeries: A randomized double-blind active control trial
by: Anita Kumari, et al.
Published: (2021)