Evaluation of the Quality Indicators in Laboratories at National AIDS Research Institute, Pune, India
Introduction: Quality indicators in a clinical laboratory are considered as useful tools for continual improvement of the laboratory services. Aim: The aim of this study was to assess timely performance of the NARI service laboratories in three phases of testing - pre-analytical, analytical and post...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Medsci Publications,
2017-02-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_d3b3e49ef34d41d3a96d57674ef2b7d6 | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Sangeeta Kulkarni |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Sachin Kale |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Urmila Ghodke |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Arun Risbud |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Smita Kulkarni |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Evaluation of the Quality Indicators in Laboratories at National AIDS Research Institute, Pune, India |
260 | |b Medsci Publications, |c 2017-02-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a 0976-3325 | ||
500 | |a 2229-6816 | ||
520 | |a Introduction: Quality indicators in a clinical laboratory are considered as useful tools for continual improvement of the laboratory services. Aim: The aim of this study was to assess timely performance of the NARI service laboratories in three phases of testing - pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical, in an effort to improve their performance. Methodology: The study included an assessment of different quality indicators from six laboratories - Clinical Biochemistry, Hematology, Serology, Microbiology, Virology and Immunology at the NARI central laboratory which provide service for the patient care. Results: Data obtained from a total of 39139 clinical samples collected over a period of two years was used in the study. The overall error rate was found to be 2.72%. The commonly observed indicators were revision of the laboratory requisition form (0.49%) and sample rejection (0.31%) during the pre-analytical phase, equipment breakdown (0.12%) and failure of the controls (0.03%) during the analytical phase, turnaround time (1.55%) and revision of the report form (0.15%) during the post- analytical phase. Conclusions: Quality indicators are important tools in improving the quality system in a clinical laboratory and patient care. | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
690 | |a Quality indicator | ||
690 | |a Pre-analytical | ||
690 | |a analytical | ||
690 | |a post-analytical | ||
690 | |a quality control | ||
690 | |a Public aspects of medicine | ||
690 | |a RA1-1270 | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n National Journal of Community Medicine, Vol 8, Iss 02 (2017) | |
787 | 0 | |n https://njcmindia.com/index.php/file/article/view/595 | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/0976-3325 | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/2229-6816 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/d3b3e49ef34d41d3a96d57674ef2b7d6 |z Connect to this object online. |