Evaluation of the Quality Indicators in Laboratories at National AIDS Research Institute, Pune, India

Introduction: Quality indicators in a clinical laboratory are considered as useful tools for continual improvement of the laboratory services. Aim: The aim of this study was to assess timely performance of the NARI service laboratories in three phases of testing - pre-analytical, analytical and post...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sangeeta Kulkarni (Author), Sachin Kale (Author), Urmila Ghodke (Author), Arun Risbud (Author), Smita Kulkarni (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Medsci Publications, 2017-02-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_d3b3e49ef34d41d3a96d57674ef2b7d6
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Sangeeta Kulkarni  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Sachin Kale  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Urmila Ghodke  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Arun Risbud  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Smita Kulkarni  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Evaluation of the Quality Indicators in Laboratories at National AIDS Research Institute, Pune, India 
260 |b Medsci Publications,   |c 2017-02-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0976-3325 
500 |a 2229-6816 
520 |a Introduction: Quality indicators in a clinical laboratory are considered as useful tools for continual improvement of the laboratory services. Aim: The aim of this study was to assess timely performance of the NARI service laboratories in three phases of testing - pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical, in an effort to improve their performance. Methodology: The study included an assessment of different quality indicators from six laboratories - Clinical Biochemistry, Hematology, Serology, Microbiology, Virology and Immunology at the NARI central laboratory which provide service for the patient care. Results: Data obtained from a total of 39139 clinical samples collected over a period of two years was used in the study. The overall error rate was found to be 2.72%. The commonly observed indicators were revision of the laboratory requisition form (0.49%) and sample rejection (0.31%) during the pre-analytical phase, equipment breakdown (0.12%) and failure of the controls (0.03%) during the analytical phase, turnaround time (1.55%) and revision of the report form (0.15%) during the post- analytical phase. Conclusions: Quality indicators are important tools in improving the quality system in a clinical laboratory and patient care. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Quality indicator 
690 |a Pre-analytical 
690 |a analytical 
690 |a post-analytical 
690 |a quality control 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n National Journal of Community Medicine, Vol 8, Iss 02 (2017) 
787 0 |n https://njcmindia.com/index.php/file/article/view/595 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0976-3325 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2229-6816 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/d3b3e49ef34d41d3a96d57674ef2b7d6  |z Connect to this object online.