A management perspective on resilience in healthcare: a framework and avenues for future research

Abstract Recent major health shocks, such as the 2014-16 Ebola, the Zika outbreak, and, last but not least, the COVID-19 pandemic, have strongly contributed to drawing attention to the issue of resilience in the healthcare domain. Nevertheless, the scientific literature appears fragmented, creating...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: L. Agostini (Author), R. Onofrio (Author), C. Piccolo (Author), A. Stefanini (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2023-07-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_d3ded5d00f3b40318f8020f4fa323af0
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a L. Agostini  |e author 
700 1 0 |a R. Onofrio  |e author 
700 1 0 |a C. Piccolo  |e author 
700 1 0 |a A. Stefanini  |e author 
245 0 0 |a A management perspective on resilience in healthcare: a framework and avenues for future research 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2023-07-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s12913-023-09701-3 
500 |a 1472-6963 
520 |a Abstract Recent major health shocks, such as the 2014-16 Ebola, the Zika outbreak, and, last but not least, the COVID-19 pandemic, have strongly contributed to drawing attention to the issue of resilience in the healthcare domain. Nevertheless, the scientific literature appears fragmented, creating difficulties in developing incremental research in this relevant managerial field. To fill this gap, this systematic literature review aims to provide a clear state of the art of the literature dealing with resilience in healthcare. Specifically, from the analysis of the theoretical articles and reviews, the key dimensions of resilience are identified, and a novel classification framework is proposed. The classification framework is then used to systematize extant empirical contributions. Two main dimensions of resilience are identified: the approach to resilience (reactive vs. proactive) and the type of crisis to deal with (acute shocks vs. chronic stressors). Four main streams of research are thus identified: (i) proactive approaches to acute shocks; (ii) proactive approaches to chronic stressors; (iii) reactive approaches to acute shocks; and (iv) reactive approaches to chronic stressors. These are scrutinised considering three additional dimensions: the level of analysis, the resources to nurture resilience, and the country context. The classification framework and the associated mapping contribute to systematising the fragmented literature on resilience in healthcare, providing a clear picture of the state of the art in this field and drawing a research agenda that opens interesting paths for future research. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Resilience 
690 |a Healthcare 
690 |a Literature review 
690 |a Flexibility 
690 |a Agility 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BMC Health Services Research, Vol 23, Iss 1, Pp 1-16 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09701-3 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1472-6963 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/d3ded5d00f3b40318f8020f4fa323af0  |z Connect to this object online.