A Biofeedback App to Instruct Abdominal Breathing (Breathing-Mentor): Pilot Experiment

BackgroundDeep and slow abdominal breathing is an important skill for the management of stress and pain. However, despite multiple proofs on the effectiveness of biofeedback, most breathing apps remain limited to pacing specific breathing patterns, without sensor feedback on the actual breathing beh...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Faust-Christmann, Corinna Anna (Author), Taetz, Bertram (Author), Zolynski, Gregor (Author), Zimmermann, Tobias (Author), Bleser, Gabriele (Author)
Format: Book
Published: JMIR Publications, 2019-09-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_d4f8532ae8214a97bc3b3f10ce53ddfc
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Faust-Christmann, Corinna Anna  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Taetz, Bertram  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Zolynski, Gregor  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Zimmermann, Tobias  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Bleser, Gabriele  |e author 
245 0 0 |a A Biofeedback App to Instruct Abdominal Breathing (Breathing-Mentor): Pilot Experiment 
260 |b JMIR Publications,   |c 2019-09-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2291-5222 
500 |a 10.2196/13703 
520 |a BackgroundDeep and slow abdominal breathing is an important skill for the management of stress and pain. However, despite multiple proofs on the effectiveness of biofeedback, most breathing apps remain limited to pacing specific breathing patterns, without sensor feedback on the actual breathing behavior. ObjectiveTo fill this gap, an app named Breathing-Mentor was developed. This app combines effective visualization of the instruction with biofeedback on deep abdominal breathing, based on the mobile phone's accelerometers. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate users' feedback and breathing behavior during initial contact with the app. MethodsTo reveal the possible effects of biofeedback, two versions of the mobile app were developed. Both contained the same visual instruction, but only the full version included additional biofeedback. In total, 40 untrained participants were randomly assigned to one of the two versions of the app. They had to follow the app's instructions as closely as possible for 5 min. ResultsThe group with additional biofeedback showed an increased signal-to-noise ratio for instructed breathing frequency (0.1 Hz) compared with those using visual instruction without biofeedback (F1,37=4.18; P<.048). During this initial contact with the full version, self-reported relaxation effectivity was, however, lower than the group using visual instruction without biofeedback (t37=−2.36; P=.02), probably owing to increased cognitive workload to follow the instruction. ConclusionsThis study supports the feasibility and usefulness of incorporating biofeedback in the Breathing-Mentor app to train abdominal breathing. Immediate effects on relaxation levels should, however, not be expected for untrained users. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Information technology 
690 |a T58.5-58.64 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n JMIR mHealth and uHealth, Vol 7, Iss 9, p e13703 (2019) 
787 0 |n http://mhealth.jmir.org/2005/9/e13703/ 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2291-5222 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/d4f8532ae8214a97bc3b3f10ce53ddfc  |z Connect to this object online.