REFORMING OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE UK: VALUE AND NORMATIVE DIMENSIONS

Abstract. Evolution strategy for reforming higher education in the UK during the transition from binary to a unitary system is considered in the context of existing alternative approaches to the choice of strategic priorities, forms and methods of educational process regulation, set out in the polic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Elizaveta V. Zolotareva (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Moscow Polytechnic University, 2017-02-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_d5253995a3334757b51f5d056d3bb129
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Elizaveta V. Zolotareva  |e author 
245 0 0 |a REFORMING OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE UK: VALUE AND NORMATIVE DIMENSIONS 
260 |b Moscow Polytechnic University,   |c 2017-02-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0869-3617 
500 |a 2072-0459 
520 |a Abstract. Evolution strategy for reforming higher education in the UK during the transition from binary to a unitary system is considered in the context of existing alternative approaches to the choice of strategic priorities, forms and methods of educational process regulation, set out in the policy reports of Lord Robbins (1963), Lord Dearing (1997) and Lord Browne (2010).The contradictory nature of neoliberal policy reforms in the last 25 years is seen as a reflection of tensions between the socioBcultural and economic functions of education, the underlying conflict between technocratic, social and humanistic approaches to solving the problem of higher education to adapt to the new technological and social reality of the twentyBfirst century. The conflict of interpretations by main political actors of such principles as social justice, freedom of choice, responsibility and efficiency is projected on their choice of strategy of forming «new» partnerships between educational subjects - universities, students, business and the state. Heuristic possibilities of using the method of critical discourseBanalysis to improve the regulatory framework in a crisis situation, and reducing risk in making innovative solutions, especially for young people, is considered by the example of the analysis of I. Fairclouch and N. Fairclouch parliamentary debate in 2010 to raise tuition fees in universities. 
546 |a EN 
546 |a RU 
690 |a higher education reforms in the uk 
690 |a social norms 
690 |a regulation in the education sphere 
690 |a lord dearing programme 
690 |a lord browne policy 
690 |a unitary system 
690 |a critical discourse-analysis 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Высшее образование в России, Vol 0, Iss 1, Pp 156-168 (2017) 
787 0 |n https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/937 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0869-3617 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2072-0459 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/d5253995a3334757b51f5d056d3bb129  |z Connect to this object online.