Construction and validation of indicators and respective definitions for the nursing outcome Swallowing Status

OBJECTIVE: to develop indicators for the nursing outcome Swallowing Status and the respective conceptual and operational definitions validated by experts and in a clinical setting among patients after having experienced a stroke.METHOD: methodological study with concept analysis and content and clin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ana Railka de Souza Oliveira (Author), Thelma Leite de Araujo (Author), Emilia Campos de Carvalho (Author), Alice Gabrielle de Sousa Costa (Author), Tahissa Frota Cavalcante (Author), Marcos Venícios de Oliveira Lopes (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Universidade de São Paulo, 2015-06-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_d5a6edf02e7d41d49c6c10dea8e44f3f
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Ana Railka de Souza Oliveira  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Thelma Leite de Araujo  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Emilia Campos de Carvalho  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Alice Gabrielle de Sousa Costa  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Tahissa Frota Cavalcante  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Marcos Venícios de Oliveira Lopes  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Construction and validation of indicators and respective definitions for the nursing outcome Swallowing Status 
260 |b Universidade de São Paulo,   |c 2015-06-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1518-8345 
500 |a 10.1590/0104-1169.0377.2575 
520 |a OBJECTIVE: to develop indicators for the nursing outcome Swallowing Status and the respective conceptual and operational definitions validated by experts and in a clinical setting among patients after having experienced a stroke.METHOD: methodological study with concept analysis and content and clinical validations. The Content Validation Index was verified for the scores assigned by 11 experts to indicators. Two pairs of nurses assessed 81 patients during the clinical validation: one pair used an instrument with definitions and the other used an instrument without definitions. The resulting assessments were compared using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, Friedman's test, and Minimal Important Difference calculation.RESULTS: All the indicators, with the exception of the indicator Ability to bring food to mouth, presented Content Validation Index above 0.80. The pair using the instrument with definitions presented an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient above 0.80 for all the indicators and similarity was found in all the assessments, according to the Minimal Important Difference calculation. The pair using the instrument without definitions presented a low coefficient (ρ<0.75) for all the indicators.CONCLUSION: the results showed that greater uniformity and accuracy was achieved by the pair of nurses using the conceptual and operational definitions for the indicators of the nursing outcome Swallowing Status. 
546 |a EN 
546 |a ES 
546 |a PT 
690 |a Aerofagia, Accidente Cerebrovascular 
690 |a Evaluación en Enfermería 
690 |a Estudios de Validación 
690 |a Nursing 
690 |a RT1-120 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, Vol 23, Iss 3, Pp 450-457 (2015) 
787 0 |n http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692015000300450&lng=en&tlng=en 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1518-8345 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/d5a6edf02e7d41d49c6c10dea8e44f3f  |z Connect to this object online.