Investigation of Progressive Learning within a Statics Course: An Analysis of Performance Retention, Critical Topics, and Active Participation
Previous research has demonstrated a link between prior knowledge and student success in engineering courses. However, while course-to-course relations exist, researchers have paid insufficient attention to internal course performance development. This study aims to address this gap-designed to quan...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
MDPI AG,
2023-06-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_d663a2a204ad4a6e86cbc6b426b44aa7 | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Naveed Ahmed |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a JeeWoong Park |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Cristian Arteaga |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Haroon Stephen |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Investigation of Progressive Learning within a Statics Course: An Analysis of Performance Retention, Critical Topics, and Active Participation |
260 | |b MDPI AG, |c 2023-06-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a 10.3390/educsci13060576 | ||
500 | |a 2227-7102 | ||
520 | |a Previous research has demonstrated a link between prior knowledge and student success in engineering courses. However, while course-to-course relations exist, researchers have paid insufficient attention to internal course performance development. This study aims to address this gap-designed to quantify and thus extract meaningful insights-by examining a fundamental engineering course, Statics, from three perspectives: (1) progressive learning reflected in performance retention throughout the course; (2) critical topics and their influence on students' performance progression; and (3) student active participation as a surrogate measure of progressive learning. By analyzing data collected from 222 students over five semesters, this study draws insights on student in-course progressive learning. The results show that early learning had significant implications in building a foundation in progressive learning throughout the semester. Additionally, insufficient knowledge on certain topics can hinder student learning progression more than others, which eventually leads to course failure. Finally, student participation is a pathway to enhance learning and achieve excellent course performance. The presented analysis approach provides educators with a mechanism for diagnosing and devising strategies to address conceptual lapses for STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) courses, especially where progressive learning is essential. | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
690 | |a progressive learning | ||
690 | |a performance retention | ||
690 | |a critical topics | ||
690 | |a student participation | ||
690 | |a Education | ||
690 | |a L | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n Education Sciences, Vol 13, Iss 6, p 576 (2023) | |
787 | 0 | |n https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/13/6/576 | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/2227-7102 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/d663a2a204ad4a6e86cbc6b426b44aa7 |z Connect to this object online. |