Comparison of Substance Sources in Experimental Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing
Funding is often a constraint when planning research, especially in countries where basic research is underfunded. Researchers must take into account these limitations, e.g., in relation to the selection of appropriate reagents, the source of which may affect the study's final results. The aim...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Book |
| Published: |
MDPI AG,
2023-02-01T00:00:00Z.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Funding is often a constraint when planning research, especially in countries where basic research is underfunded. Researchers must take into account these limitations, e.g., in relation to the selection of appropriate reagents, the source of which may affect the study's final results. The aim of this article was to compare the results of bacteria susceptibility testing using three different sources of antimicrobial: the pure powder available from the supplier and two tablet formulations with different excipients. The chosen substance was furazidin (nitrofuran derivative). The susceptibility was tested on a group of 45 uropathogenic Enterobacterales using both microdilution and disk diffusion methods. The obtained results indicated that despite the relatively higher price, the powder appeared to be the best substance for scientific purposes, especially for quantitative determinations. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | 10.3390/scipharm91010010 2218-0532 0036-8709 |