The Effects of Full and Alternative Day Block Scheduling on Language Arts and Science Achievement in a Junior High School

The effects of a full (4 X 4) block scheduling program and an alternate day (AB) block scheduling program in a junior high school were under investigation in this study through the use of an ex post facto, matched sampling design. Measures investigated were standardized achievement tests in science...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chance W. Lewis (Author), R. Brian Cobb (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Arizona State University, 2003-11-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_d7e19f32f77a4497aaf0fbb6e794aa98
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Chance W. Lewis  |e author 
700 1 0 |a R. Brian Cobb  |e author 
245 0 0 |a The Effects of Full and Alternative Day Block Scheduling on Language Arts and Science Achievement in a Junior High School 
260 |b Arizona State University,   |c 2003-11-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1068-2341 
520 |a The effects of a full (4 X 4) block scheduling program and an alternate day (AB) block scheduling program in a junior high school were under investigation in this study through the use of an ex post facto, matched sampling design. Measures investigated were standardized achievement tests in science and language arts. Both forms of block scheduling had been in place for several years, and one teacher in science and one teacher in language arts had taught students under both forms of scheduling. Because the sampling designs and analyses were different for the science and the language arts areas, two studies are reported here-each examining the effects of 4 x 4, AB, and traditional scheduling with attribute variables of gender and student skill levels in each analysis. Results consistently show students in both forms of block scheduling outperforming students in traditional scheduling, and that AB block scheduling has the largest positive impact on low-achieving students. 
546 |a EN 
546 |a ES 
546 |a PT 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Education Policy Analysis Archives, Vol 11, p 41 (2003) 
787 0 |n http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/269 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1068-2341 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/d7e19f32f77a4497aaf0fbb6e794aa98  |z Connect to this object online.