The evaluation of an evidence-based clinical answer format for pediatricians

• Main Authors: Seto Iva (Author), Foisy Michelle (Author), Arkison Brad (Author), Klassen Terry (Author), Williams Katrina (Author)
• Format: Book
• Published: BMC, 2012-03-01T00:00:00Z.
• Subjects: article
• Online Access: Connect to this object online.
• Notes: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-34; 1471-2431
• Keywords: Internet; ut [Utilization]; Pediatrics; ed [Education]; Questionnaires; Delivery of health care; st [Standards]; Point-of-Care systems; st [Standards]; Pediatrics; RJ1-570
• Source: BMC Pediatrics, Vol 12, Iss 1, p 34 (2012)

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Clinicians are increasingly using electronic sources of evidence to support clinical decision-making; however, there are multiple demands on clinician time, and summarised and synthesised evidence is needed. Clinical Answers (CA) have been developed to address this need; the CA is a synthesised evidence-based summary that supports point-of-care clinical decision-making. The aim of this paper is to report on a survey used to test and improve the CA format.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>An online survey was sent to pediatricians via e-mail and posted on a child health clinical standards website. Quantitative data analysis consisted primarily of descriptive statistics; qualitative data analysis consisted of content analysis.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Eighty-three pediatricians responded to the survey. Most respondents found the CA useful or very useful (93%) and agreed or strongly agreed that the layout was effective and allowed them to quickly locate critical information (82%). Quantitative and qualitative data suggested that respondents thought there should be less detail in the linked figures and tables (p = 0.0002), but overall respondents seemed to think there was an appropriate level of detail in most sections of the CA.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Based on the quantitative and qualitative survey responses, major and minor modifications to the CA format were implemented, such as removing forest plots, adding links in each addendum to bring the user back to the front page, and adding an 'Implications for practice' section to the CA. Findings suggest that CAs will be a useful tool for pediatricians; thus, the research team has now begun creating CAs to assist busy clinicians in their day-to-day clinical practice by providing high-quality information for decision-making at the point-of-care.</p>