Pain level between clear aligners and fixed appliances: a systematic review

Abstract Objectives To assess if there is any difference in pain levels between orthodontic treatment with clear aligners or fixed appliances. Materials and methods An electronic search was completed in PubMed, The Cochrane Database, Web of Science, Scopus, Lilacs, Google Scholar, Clinical Trials, a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paula Coutinho Cardoso (Author), Daybelis Gonzalez Espinosa (Author), Paulo Mecenas (Author), Carlos Flores-Mir (Author), David Normando (Author)
Format: Book
Published: SpringerOpen, 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_d90f3c99fb084e88a62487e5f7c13cf0
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Paula Coutinho Cardoso  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Daybelis Gonzalez Espinosa  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Paulo Mecenas  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Carlos Flores-Mir  |e author 
700 1 0 |a David Normando  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Pain level between clear aligners and fixed appliances: a systematic review 
260 |b SpringerOpen,   |c 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s40510-019-0303-z 
500 |a 2196-1042 
520 |a Abstract Objectives To assess if there is any difference in pain levels between orthodontic treatment with clear aligners or fixed appliances. Materials and methods An electronic search was completed in PubMed, The Cochrane Database, Web of Science, Scopus, Lilacs, Google Scholar, Clinical Trials, and OpenGrey databases without any restrictions until February 2019. All comparative study types contrasting pain levels between clear aligners and fixed appliances were included. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, ROBINS-I-Tool, or ROB 2.0 according to the study design. The level of evidence was assessed through the GRADE tool. Results After removal of duplicates, exclusion by title and abstract, and reading the full text, only seven articles were included. Five were prospective non-randomized clinical trials (CCT), one was a cross-sectional study, and one was a randomized clinical trial (RCT). Two studies presented a high RoB, three a moderate RoB, and two a low RoB (including the RCT). A meta-analysis was not performed because of clinical, statistical, and methodological heterogeneity. Most of the studies found that pain levels in patients treated with Invisalign were lower than those treated with conventional fixed appliances during the first days of treatment. Differences disappeared thereafter. No evidence was identified for other brands of clear aligners. Conclusions Based on a moderate level of certainty, orthodontic patients treated with Invisalign appear to feel lower levels of pain than those treated with fixed appliances during the first few days of treatment. Thereafter (up to 3 months), differences were not noted. Malocclusion complexity level among included studies was mild. Pain is one of many considerations and predictability and technical outcome are more important, mainly considering that the difference does not seem to occur after the first months of the orthodontic treatment. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Orthodontic appliances 
690 |a Pain 
690 |a Invisalign 
690 |a Malocclusion 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Progress in Orthodontics, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-17 (2020) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-019-0303-z 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2196-1042 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/d90f3c99fb084e88a62487e5f7c13cf0  |z Connect to this object online.