Effects of mutual health organizations on use of priority health-care services in urban and rural Mali: a case-control study

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of a community-based mutual health organization (MHO) on utilization of priority health services, financial protection of its members and inclusion of the poor and other target groups. METHODS: Four MHOs were established in two districts in Mali. A case-control stud...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lynne Miller Franco (Author), François Pathé Diop (Author), Clara R Burgert (Author), Allison Gamble Kelley (Author), Marty Makinen (Author), Cheick Hamed Tidiane Simpara (Author)
Format: Book
Published: The World Health Organization, 2008-11-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_d9fd95dc84b245feaf91a0b45fde8fe4
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Lynne Miller Franco  |e author 
700 1 0 |a François Pathé Diop  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Clara R Burgert  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Allison Gamble Kelley  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Marty Makinen  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Cheick Hamed Tidiane Simpara  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Effects of mutual health organizations on use of priority health-care services in urban and rural Mali: a case-control study 
260 |b The World Health Organization,   |c 2008-11-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0042-9686 
520 |a OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of a community-based mutual health organization (MHO) on utilization of priority health services, financial protection of its members and inclusion of the poor and other target groups. METHODS: Four MHOs were established in two districts in Mali. A case-control study was carried out in which household survey data were collected from 817 MHO member households, 787 non-member households in MHO catchment areas, and 676 control households in areas without MHOs. We compiled MHO register data by household for a 22-month period. Outcome measures included utilization of priority services, health expenditures and out-of-pocket payments. Independent variables included individual, household and community demographic, socioeconomic and access characteristics, as determined through a household survey in 2004. FINDINGS: MHO members who were up to date on premium payments (controlling for education, distance to the nearest health facility and other factors) were 1.7 times more likely to get treated for fevers in modern facilities; three times more likely to take children with diarrhoea to a health facility and/or treat them with oral rehydration salts at home; twice as likely to make four or more prenatal visits; and twice as likely, if pregnant or younger than 5 years, to sleep under an insecticide-treated net (P < 0.10 or better in all cases). However, distance was also a significant negative predictor for the utilization of many services, particularly assisted deliveries. Household and individual enrolment in an MHO were not significantly associated with socioeconomic status (with the exception of the highest quintile), and MHOs seemed to provide some financial protection for their members. CONCLUSIONS: MHOs are one mechanism that countries strengthening the supply of primary care can use to increase financial access to - and equity in - priority health services. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Bulletin of the World Health Organization, Vol 86, Iss 11, Pp 830-838 (2008) 
787 0 |n http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0042-96862008001100012&lng=en&tlng=en 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0042-9686 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/d9fd95dc84b245feaf91a0b45fde8fe4  |z Connect to this object online.