Randomised controlled trials and clinical maternity care: moving on from intention-to-treat and other simplistic analyses of efficacy

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The obstetrical literature is dominated by Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs), with the vast majority being analysed using an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach. Whilst this approach may reflect well the consequence of assignment to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: AW Welsh (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2013-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_dac8bc8180aa4ffd9b46b4cc3baf7a88
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a AW Welsh  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Randomised controlled trials and clinical maternity care: moving on from intention-to-treat and other simplistic analyses of efficacy 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2013-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/1471-2393-13-15 
500 |a 1471-2393 
520 |a <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The obstetrical literature is dominated by Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs), with the vast majority being analysed using an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach. Whilst this approach may reflect well the consequence of assignment to therapy and hence the 'trialists'perspective', it may fail to address the consequence of actually receiving therapy (the patient's perspective).</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>This review questions the ubiquitous adherence to the ITT approach, and gives examples of where this may have misled the maternity care professions. It gives an overview of techniques to overcome potential deficiencies in result presentation, using method effectiveness models such as 'Per Protocol' (PP) or 'As-Treated' (AT) that may give more accurate clinical meaning to the presentation of obstetrical results. It then proceeds to cover the added benefits, considerations and potential pitfalls of the use of Instrumental Variable (IV) models in order to better reflect the clinical context.</p> <p>Summary</p> <p>While ITT may achieve statistical purity, it frequently fails to address the true clinical or patient's perspective. Though more complex and potentially beset by problems of their own, alternative methods of result presentation may better serve the latter aim. Each of the other methods may rely on untestable assumptions and therefore it is wisest that study results are presented in multiple formats to allow for informed reader evaluation.</p> 
546 |a EN 
690 |a RCT 
690 |a ITT 
690 |a Method-effectiveness 
690 |a Clinical efficacy 
690 |a Clinical effectiveness 
690 |a Instrumental variable 
690 |a Gynecology and obstetrics 
690 |a RG1-991 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, Vol 13, Iss 1, p 15 (2013) 
787 0 |n http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/13/15 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2393 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/dac8bc8180aa4ffd9b46b4cc3baf7a88  |z Connect to this object online.