PERCEPTION OF NURSES IN DECISION-MAKING PROCESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE FOR PATIENTS WITH CANCER IN PUBLIC HEALTH CENTERS

Background: Nurses have a key role in promoting patients' involvement in decision-making process of palliative care to improve their dignity and satisfaction. However, there is a dearth of studies exploring this involvement, especially in public health centers in Indonesia. Objective: This stud...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Atsarina Fauzan (Author), Sri Setiyarini (Author), Christantie Effendy (Author), Martina Sinta Kristanti (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Belitung Raya Foundation, 2019-08-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_dba32b25fa704e71abdf3df8f0a74c5f
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Atsarina Fauzan  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Sri Setiyarini  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Christantie Effendy  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Martina Sinta Kristanti  |e author 
245 0 0 |a PERCEPTION OF NURSES IN DECISION-MAKING PROCESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE FOR PATIENTS WITH CANCER IN PUBLIC HEALTH CENTERS 
260 |b Belitung Raya Foundation,   |c 2019-08-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.815 
500 |a 2477-4073 
500 |a 2477-4073 
520 |a Background: Nurses have a key role in promoting patients' involvement in decision-making process of palliative care to improve their dignity and satisfaction. However, there is a dearth of studies exploring this involvement, especially in public health centers in Indonesia. Objective: This study aimed to explore the perception of nurses in decision-making process and to understand what type of decision-making made by health care providers in palliative care. Methods: This was a descriptive explorative study with qualitative approach. Participants were selected using purposive and snowball sampling. Data were collected using Focus Group Discussion (FGD) and in-depth interview. Content analysis method by inductive approach was used for data analysis. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) was also used. Results: Eight themes emerged in this study, namely: (1) Collecting information about patients' current physiological condition, (2) Creating alternative strategies according to the patients' current physiological condition, (3) Establishing implementation type to be performed, (4) Providing information to the patients, (5) Discussing decision-making between patients and family, (6) Choosing/rejecting an action by patients, (7) Performing selected actions, and (8) Evaluating action. Three points that are different from the existing theory were: (i) there was a discussion between patients and family, (ii) the absence of the process of collecting information after a patient rejects to act, and (iii) there were three types of decision-making: paternalistic, shared, and informed decision-making. Conclusion: This study serves as an input for nurses to pay more attention in decision-making process in palliative care in patients with cancer, and to encourage patients to give contribution in decision-making as part of shared decision-making. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a decision-making 
690 |a palliative care 
690 |a public health center 
690 |a cancer 
690 |a Nursing 
690 |a RT1-120 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Belitung Nursing Journal, Vol 5, Iss 4, Pp 169-175 (2019) 
787 0 |n https://belitungraya.org/BRP/index.php/bnj/article/view/815 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2477-4073 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2477-4073 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/dba32b25fa704e71abdf3df8f0a74c5f  |z Connect to this object online.