BANGERTER FOILS IN THE POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ESOTROPIA.
Purpose: To evaluate the application of Bangerter foils in the postoperative management of esotropia Methods: A retrospective study of 200 patients who underwent bimedial recessions for various forms of alternating/alternated esotropia in the period of 2000-2013. In the cases of residual postoperati...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Peytchinski Publishing,
2014-12-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_dbb21f2b58174633ac23e5b36a7cb4c6 | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Galina G. Dimitrova |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a BANGERTER FOILS IN THE POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ESOTROPIA. |
260 | |b Peytchinski Publishing, |c 2014-12-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a 10.5272/jimab.2014206.547 | ||
500 | |a 1312-773X | ||
520 | |a Purpose: To evaluate the application of Bangerter foils in the postoperative management of esotropia Methods: A retrospective study of 200 patients who underwent bimedial recessions for various forms of alternating/alternated esotropia in the period of 2000-2013. In the cases of residual postoperative angle, tendency of recurrence of strabismus and preferred fixation, Bangerter foil was fixed on the corrective glass of the dominant eye- either on the next day of surgery, or on the 10-th postoperative day and was in use for at least 6 months. Results: Bangerter foils were applied in 67(35,1%) under corrected patients with a mean residual angle for near 7,01±3,51Δ. Mean residual angle in patients without foils was 3,47±4,06Δ (p<0,001). Statistically significant factors in patients with filters were amblyopia treatment before surgery (p<0,001), anisometropia (p=0,003) and type of esotropia (accommodative vs. non accommodative (p<0,001). Within the group without filters there was a significant increase of the residual angle for near on the third (p<0,001) and sixth month (p=0,036), while within the group with foils angle was not significantly changed (p=0,325; p=0,058) with time. In the group with foils no cases with relapse of strabismus and amblyopia were recorded and even a decrease of the postoperative angle was clinically observed in some patients. Conclusion: To our experience Bangerter foils are a reliable tool in the postoperative management of undercorrected esotropia. | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
690 | |a Bangerter foils | ||
690 | |a amblyopia | ||
690 | |a esotropia | ||
690 | |a central suppression | ||
690 | |a fusion | ||
690 | |a Dentistry | ||
690 | |a RK1-715 | ||
690 | |a Medicine (General) | ||
690 | |a R5-920 | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n Journal of IMAB, Vol 20, Iss 6, Pp 547-551 (2014) | |
787 | 0 | |n http://www.journal-imab-bg.org/issue-2014/issue6/JofIMAB_2014-20-6p547-551.pdf | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/1312-773X | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/dbb21f2b58174633ac23e5b36a7cb4c6 |z Connect to this object online. |