Accuracy of Smart Scales on Weight and Body Composition: Observational Study

BackgroundSmart scales are increasingly used at home by patients to monitor their body weight and body composition, but scale accuracy has not often been documented. ObjectiveThe goal of the research was to determine the accuracy of 3 commercially available smart scales for weight and body compositi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Frija-Masson, Justine (Author), Mullaert, Jimmy (Author), Vidal-Petiot, Emmanuelle (Author), Pons-Kerjean, Nathalie (Author), Flamant, Martin (Author), d'Ortho, Marie-Pia (Author)
Format: Book
Published: JMIR Publications, 2021-04-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_dcc0ac8730a4493bbe49b1f41b1a1a59
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Frija-Masson, Justine  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mullaert, Jimmy  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Vidal-Petiot, Emmanuelle  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Pons-Kerjean, Nathalie  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Flamant, Martin  |e author 
700 1 0 |a d'Ortho, Marie-Pia  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Accuracy of Smart Scales on Weight and Body Composition: Observational Study 
260 |b JMIR Publications,   |c 2021-04-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2291-5222 
500 |a 10.2196/22487 
520 |a BackgroundSmart scales are increasingly used at home by patients to monitor their body weight and body composition, but scale accuracy has not often been documented. ObjectiveThe goal of the research was to determine the accuracy of 3 commercially available smart scales for weight and body composition compared with dual x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) as the gold standard. MethodsWe designed a cross-sectional study in consecutive patients evaluated for DEXA in a physiology unit in a tertiary hospital in France. There were no exclusion criteria except patient declining to participate. Patients were weighed with one smart scale immediately after DEXA. Three scales were compared (scale 1: Body Partner [Téfal], scale 2: DietPack [Terraillon], and scale 3: Body Cardio [Nokia Withings]). We determined absolute error between the gold standard values obtained from DEXA and the smart scales for body mass, fat mass, and lean mass. ResultsThe sample for analysis included 53, 52, and 48 patients for each of the 3 tested smart scales, respectively. The median absolute error for body weight was 0.3 kg (interquartile range [IQR] -0.1, 0.7), 0 kg (IQR -0.4, 0.3), and 0.25 kg (IQR -0.10, 0.52), respectively. For fat mass, absolute errors were -2.2 kg (IQR -5.8, 1.3), -4.4 kg (IQR -6.6, 0), and -3.7 kg (IQR -8.0, 0.28), respectively. For muscular mass, absolute errors were -2.2 kg (IQR -5.8, 1.3), -4.4 kg (IQR -6.6, 0), and -3.65 kg (IQR -8.03, 0.28), respectively. Factors associated with fat mass measurement error were weight for scales 1 and 2 (P=.03 and P<.001, respectively), BMI for scales 1 and 2 (P=.034 and P<.001, respectively), body fat for scale 1 (P<.001), and muscular and bone mass for scale 2 (P<.001 for both). Factors associated with muscular mass error were weight and BMI for scale 1 (P<.001 and P=.004, respectively), body fat for scales 1 and 2 (P<.001 for both), and muscular and bone mass for scale 2 (P<.001 and P=.002, respectively). ConclusionsSmart scales are not accurate for body composition and should not replace DEXA in patient care. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03803098; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03803098 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Information technology 
690 |a T58.5-58.64 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n JMIR mHealth and uHealth, Vol 9, Iss 4, p e22487 (2021) 
787 0 |n https://mhealth.jmir.org/2021/4/e22487 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2291-5222 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/dcc0ac8730a4493bbe49b1f41b1a1a59  |z Connect to this object online.