Cover Image

Deconvolution of the particle size distribution of ProRoot MTA and MTA Angelus

Objective Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) cements contain two types of particles, namely Portland cement (PC) (nominally 80% w/w) and bismuth oxide (BO) (20%). This study aims to determine the particle size distribution (PSD) of PC and BO found in MTA. Materials and methods The PSDs of ProRoot MTA...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	William Nguyen Ha (Author), Fardad Shakibaie (Author), Bill Kahler (Author), Laurence James Walsh (Author)
Format:	Book
Published:	Medical Journals Sweden, 2016-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:	article
Online Access:	Connect to this object online.
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

Analysis of marginal seal of ProRoot MTA, MTA Angelus biodentine, and glass ionomer cement as root-end filling materials: An in vitro study
by: Sakshi Malhotra, et al.
Published: (2015)

The effect of blood and synthetic tissue fluid on the microhardness of ProRoot MTA, OrthoMTA and RetroMTA
by: Noushin Shokouhinejad, et al.
Published: (2017)

In Vitro Comparison of the Push-Out Bond Strength of RetroMTA, OrthoMTA, and ProRoot MTA
by: G Sedaghati, et al.
Published: (2023)

Comparative evaluation of sealing of ProRoot MTA and Bio MTA in canal obturation by fluid infiltration
by: Abbasali Khademi, et al.
Published: (2018)

Comparison of Antibacterial Activities of ProRoot MTA, OrthoMTA, and RetroMTA Against Three Anaerobic Endodontic Bacteria
by: Sedigheh Khedmat, et al.
Published: (2018)

Evaluation of the Marginal Adaptation of ProRoot MTA, Biodentine, and RetroMTA as Root-end Filling Materials
by: Marjan Bolbolian, et al.
Published: (2020)

Evaluation of the cytotoxic effects of a new Harvard MTA compared to MTA Flow and ProRoot MTA on human gingival fibroblasts
by: Abdel-Rahman Youssef, et al.
Published: (2021)

Cytotoxicity of NeoMTA Plus, ProRoot MTA and Biodentine on human dental pulp stem cells
by: Sinem Birant, et al.
Published: (2021)

Biodentine TM or MTA ProRoot TM: the comparative analysis of application in endodontics
by: Z. S. Khabadze, et al.
Published: (2020)

Pulp Tissue Reaction of Dog Canines to Root MTA and Portland Cement Compared to ProRoot MTA as Pulp Capping Agents
by: H. Razmi, et al.
Published: (2006)

Comparative study of pulpal responses to ProRoot MTA, Vitapex, and Metapex in canine teeth
by: Woojin Kwon, et al.
Published: (2021)

Evaluation of biocompatibility and bioactive potential of Well-Root PT by comparison with ProRoot MTA and Biodentine
by: Yong Kwon Chae, et al.
Published: (2024)

Effect of ProRoot MTA® and Biodentine® on osteoclastic differentiation and activity of mouse bone marrow macrophages
by: Miri Kim, et al.
Published: (2019)

Evaluation of Cytotoxicity of ProRoot MTA and Endocem at Different Times and Concentrations on Human Gingival Fibroblasts
by: AA Moshary, et al.
Published: (2021)

An Invitro Study on Microleakage of Root MTA, Proroot MTA, One Coat Bond and Amalgam in Furcation Perforation Repair
by: M Bidar, et al.
Published: (2007)

Evaluation of Cytotoxicity of Endoseal MTA Sealer as a Root Canal Perforation Restorative Material on Gingival Fibroblasts Compared to Iranian ProRoot MTA and CEM by MTT test
by: Salma Omidi, et al.
Published: (2022)

Biocompatibility of NeoMTA Plus® versus MTA Angelus as delayed furcation perforation repair materials in a dog model
by: Khaled M. Abboud, et al.
Published: (2021)

Evaluation of reparative dentin formation of ProRoot MTA, Biodentine and BioAggregate using micro-CT and immunohistochemistry
by: Jia Kim, et al.
Published: (2016)

Respuesta del tejido periapical de la rata al ProRoot MTA y a un cemento Portland modificado: un estudio metodológico Periapical tissue response to ProRoot MTA and to a modified Portland cement in rats: A methodological study
by: Ricardo Martínez Lalis, et al.
Published: (2010)

The influence of particle size and curing conditions on testing mineral trioxide aggregate cement
by: William Nguyen Ha, et al.
Published: (2016)

Evaluation and comparing the tooth discoloration induced by cold ceramic and MTA Angelus as endodontic cements
by: Fatemeh MokhtariFatemeh Mokhtari, et al.
Published: (2022)

Comparison of Bacterial Microleakage of Endoseal MTA Sealer and Pro-Root MTA in Root Perforation
by: Mehdi Dastorani, et al.
Published: (2021)

Sealing ability of grar MTA AngelusTM, CPM TM and MBPc used as apical plugs
by: Fernando Accorsi Orosco, et al.
Published: (2008)

Evaluation of bacterial leakage of four root- end filling materials: Gray Pro Root MTA, White Pro Root MTA, Root MTA and Portland Cement (type I)
by: Zarabian M., et al.
Published: (2005)

An In Vitro Comparison of Microleakage of White Pro Root MTA and Root MTA in Retro Grade Cavity
by: L Safi, et al.
Published: (2007)

Effect of ProRoot MTA, Portland cement, and amalgam on the expression of fibronectin, collagen I, and TGFβ by human periodontal ligament fibroblasts in vitro
by: Sara Fayazi, et al.
Published: (2011)

A comparative study of the physicochemical properties of hesperidin, MTA-Angelus and calcium hydroxide as pulp capping materials
by: Ebtesam O. Abo El-Mal, et al.
Published: (2019)

The effect of different chelating agents on the push-out bond strength of proroot mta and endosequence root repair material
by: Arife Kaptan, et al.
Published: (2019)

Cytotoxicity evaluation of Pro Root MTA, Root MTA and Portland Cement (PC) on L929 mouse fibroblasts
by: Sharifian MR, et al.
Published: (2007)

Effect of blood contamination on marginal adaptation of cold ceramic and MTA angelus: a scanning electron microscopic study
by: Fatemeh Mokhtari, et al.
Published: (2023)

Evaluation and comparison of four types of bio-ceramic materials AGM MTA, Ortho MTA, pro root MTA and Cem cement in oral and dental health
by: Fatemeh Asadi Yalin, et al.
Published: (2024)

Assessment of antifungal activity of Proroot mineral trioxide aggregate and mineral trioxide aggregate-Angelus
by: Ali Kangarlou, et al.
Published: (2012)

A comparative histologic study on furcal perforation repair with Root MTA and Pro Root MTA in fully developed teeth in dog
by: Rahimi S., et al.
Published: (2005)

Marginal adaptation, solubility and biocompatibility of TheraCal LC compared with MTA-angelus and biodentine as a furcation perforation repair material
by: M. A. Alazrag, et al.
Published: (2020)

Evaluation of sealing ability of MTA flow, biodentine and pro-root MTA to seal the furcal perforation with and without internal matrix- An In vitro study
by: Mahendra Patel, et al.
Published: (2023)

"An Investigation on the Histologic Responses of Periapical Tissues Following Retrofilling with Root MTA and Portland Cement Type I Versus Pro Root MTA in the Canine Teeth of Cats "
by: M. Zarabian, et al.
Published: (2004)

Comparison of setting time of an Iranian MTA with a foreign MTA
by: Sakineh Arami, et al.
Published: (2018)

Comparative evaluation of the effect of cold ceramic and MTA-Angelus on cell viability, attachment and differentiation of dental pulp stem cells and periodontal ligament fibroblasts: an in vitro study
by: Sedigheh Khedmat, et al.
Published: (2021)

Hypertension affects the biocompatibility and biomineralization of MTA, High-plasticity MTA, and Biodentine®
by: Leopoldo COSME-SILVA, et al.

Effect of white Proroot® MTA and two Thai white portland cements mixed with bismuth oxide on cementoblastic differentiation in human cementoblast-like cell line
by: Treesukhon Eakbannasingh
Published: (2013)