Shoulder biomechanics of para-table tennis: a case study of a standing class para-athlete with severe leg impairment
Abstract Background Both able-bodied and Class 7 para-table tennis players compete while standing, but do they use the same techniques to hit the ball? This case study examined the shoulder joint kinematics of a highly skilled para-table tennis player with severe leg impairment. Methods One internat...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
BMC,
2022-07-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_dd68c47c66b14fd3a481fef890689b5c | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Pui Wah Kong |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Jia Wen Yam |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Shoulder biomechanics of para-table tennis: a case study of a standing class para-athlete with severe leg impairment |
260 | |b BMC, |c 2022-07-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a 10.1186/s13102-022-00536-9 | ||
500 | |a 2052-1847 | ||
520 | |a Abstract Background Both able-bodied and Class 7 para-table tennis players compete while standing, but do they use the same techniques to hit the ball? This case study examined the shoulder joint kinematics of a highly skilled para-table tennis player with severe leg impairment. Methods One international level Class 7 male para-table tennis player was compared with a control group of 9 male, competitive university team players. Participants performed 15 trials of forehand and 15 trials of backhand topspin drives. Shoulder abduction/adduction angles and joint range of motion (ROM) were measured using an inertial measurement system. Results The joint ROM of the para-player was comparable to the control group in the forehand [para-player 38°, controls 32 (15)°] and slightly larger in backhand [para-player 35°, controls 24 (16)°]. Waveform analysis revealed significant differences in the entire forehand drives (p < .001) and the preparation (p < .001) and follow-through phases (p = .014) of the backhand drives. Conclusions Coaches should not simply instruct para-table tennis players to replicate the characteristics of able-bodied players. Depending on the nature of the physical impairment, para-players should optimise their movement strategies for successful performance. | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
690 | |a Kinematics | ||
690 | |a Variability | ||
690 | |a Angle | ||
690 | |a Forehand | ||
690 | |a Backhand | ||
690 | |a Statistical parametric mapping | ||
690 | |a Sports medicine | ||
690 | |a RC1200-1245 | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol 14, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2022) | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-022-00536-9 | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/2052-1847 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/dd68c47c66b14fd3a481fef890689b5c |z Connect to this object online. |