Shoulder biomechanics of para-table tennis: a case study of a standing class para-athlete with severe leg impairment

Abstract Background Both able-bodied and Class 7 para-table tennis players compete while standing, but do they use the same techniques to hit the ball? This case study examined the shoulder joint kinematics of a highly skilled para-table tennis player with severe leg impairment. Methods One internat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pui Wah Kong (Author), Jia Wen Yam (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2022-07-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_dd68c47c66b14fd3a481fef890689b5c
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Pui Wah Kong  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jia Wen Yam  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Shoulder biomechanics of para-table tennis: a case study of a standing class para-athlete with severe leg impairment 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2022-07-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s13102-022-00536-9 
500 |a 2052-1847 
520 |a Abstract Background Both able-bodied and Class 7 para-table tennis players compete while standing, but do they use the same techniques to hit the ball? This case study examined the shoulder joint kinematics of a highly skilled para-table tennis player with severe leg impairment. Methods One international level Class 7 male para-table tennis player was compared with a control group of 9 male, competitive university team players. Participants performed 15 trials of forehand and 15 trials of backhand topspin drives. Shoulder abduction/adduction angles and joint range of motion (ROM) were measured using an inertial measurement system. Results The joint ROM of the para-player was comparable to the control group in the forehand [para-player 38°, controls 32 (15)°] and slightly larger in backhand [para-player 35°, controls 24 (16)°]. Waveform analysis revealed significant differences in the entire forehand drives (p < .001) and the preparation (p < .001) and follow-through phases (p = .014) of the backhand drives. Conclusions Coaches should not simply instruct para-table tennis players to replicate the characteristics of able-bodied players. Depending on the nature of the physical impairment, para-players should optimise their movement strategies for successful performance. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Kinematics 
690 |a Variability 
690 |a Angle 
690 |a Forehand 
690 |a Backhand 
690 |a Statistical parametric mapping 
690 |a Sports medicine 
690 |a RC1200-1245 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol 14, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2022) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-022-00536-9 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2052-1847 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/dd68c47c66b14fd3a481fef890689b5c  |z Connect to this object online.