The use of generalized synthetic control method to evaluate air pollution control measures of G20 Hangzhou Summit

The traditional campaign-style enforcement in environmental governance has been debated whether its rebound effect is likely to eat away the short-term environmental benefits and subsequently bring about severer pollution. There are methodological challenges in assessing the effect of temporary envi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hao-Neng Huang (Author), Zhou Yang (Author), Yukun Wang (Author), Chun-Quan Ou (Author), Ying Guan (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Frontiers Media S.A., 2022-10-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_ded3ccdfcd3141dcb3189fc5a3ff25fe
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Hao-Neng Huang  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Zhou Yang  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Yukun Wang  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Chun-Quan Ou  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ying Guan  |e author 
245 0 0 |a The use of generalized synthetic control method to evaluate air pollution control measures of G20 Hangzhou Summit 
260 |b Frontiers Media S.A.,   |c 2022-10-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2296-2565 
500 |a 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1021177 
520 |a The traditional campaign-style enforcement in environmental governance has been debated whether its rebound effect is likely to eat away the short-term environmental benefits and subsequently bring about severer pollution. There are methodological challenges in assessing the effect of temporary environmental intervention. By applying the generalized synthetic control method (GSCM), we quantified and characterized the effectiveness of environmental regulations implemented for the G20 Hangzhou Summit held on 4-5 September, 2016. The summit was successful in reducing Air Quality Composite Index by 17.40% (95% CI: 9.53%, 24.60%), 13.30% (95% CI: 4.23%, 21.50%), and 10.09% (95% CI: 2.01%, 17.51%) in the core, strictly-regulated and regulated areas respectively, comparing with the index expected under a "No-G20" scenario during the preparatory period and the summit period (July-September 2016), and the reduction of the levels in specific pollutants (PM10, PM2.5, NO2, and CO) was also observed. Besides, the environmental benefits lasted for at least 3 months after the summit. This study demonstrates that the pollution control measures during the G20 Hangzhou Summit improved air quality immediately and continuously, and the GSCM provides a useful tool for evaluating the intervention effects of environmental regulations. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a air pollution 
690 |a generalized synthetic control method 
690 |a G20 Hangzhou Summit 
690 |a causal inference 
690 |a mega event 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Frontiers in Public Health, Vol 10 (2022) 
787 0 |n https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1021177/full 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2296-2565 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/ded3ccdfcd3141dcb3189fc5a3ff25fe  |z Connect to this object online.