Smoking and Risk of Urolithiasis: Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
BackgroundEarlier studies have warned about the effects of smoking on urolithiasis. Some studies have deemed that smoking has a promoting effect on urolithiasis, whereas others have considered that no inevitable association exists between the two. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to estimate...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.,
2022-03-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_df3399a632b24608bd5ca73844c16f28 | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Ling Yue |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Qiaofeng Pai |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Xiaolin Wu |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Jinghua Zhang |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Smoking and Risk of Urolithiasis: Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies |
260 | |b Frontiers Media S.A., |c 2022-03-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a 2296-2565 | ||
500 | |a 10.3389/fpubh.2022.816756 | ||
520 | |a BackgroundEarlier studies have warned about the effects of smoking on urolithiasis. Some studies have deemed that smoking has a promoting effect on urolithiasis, whereas others have considered that no inevitable association exists between the two. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to estimate whether smoking is associated with urolithiasis risk.MethodsTo identify publications from related observational studies, we performed a search on PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases from inception until October 1, 2021. According to the heterogeneity, random-effect model was used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsFive articles were included in the meta-analysis, representing data for 20,402 subjects, of which 1,758 (8.62%) had urolithiasis as defined according to the criteria. Three articles are concerned with analysis between ex-smokers and non-smokers, in which a significant difference was observed (OR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.48-2.01). Our comparison of current smokers with non-smokers in another meta-analysis of three articles revealed no significant difference between them (OR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.94-1.23). Finally, we separated subjects into ever-smokers and never-smokers and found a significant difference between the two groups in the analysis of three articles (OR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.17-1.47). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of the current results.ConclusionCombined evidence from observational studies demonstrates a significant relation between smoking and urolithiasis. The trend of elevated urolithiasis risk from smoking was found in ever-smokers vs. never-smokers. | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
690 | |a urolithiasis | ||
690 | |a smoking | ||
690 | |a health | ||
690 | |a meta-analysis | ||
690 | |a observational | ||
690 | |a Public aspects of medicine | ||
690 | |a RA1-1270 | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n Frontiers in Public Health, Vol 10 (2022) | |
787 | 0 | |n https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.816756/full | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/2296-2565 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/df3399a632b24608bd5ca73844c16f28 |z Connect to this object online. |