An evaluation of superhydrophilic surfaces of dental implants - a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background The characteristics of a dental implant surface have a decisive influence on the process of osseointegration. According to the current state of knowledge, surface modification can not only affect the morphology of cells, and in this way have a positive impact on osseointegration....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arkadiusz Makowiecki (Author), Jakub Hadzik (Author), Artur Błaszczyszyn (Author), Tomasz Gedrange (Author), Marzena Dominiak (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2019-05-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_df3d7c8fbb9d4457beadd9bb0de8d4c8
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Arkadiusz Makowiecki  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jakub Hadzik  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Artur Błaszczyszyn  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Tomasz Gedrange  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Marzena Dominiak  |e author 
245 0 0 |a An evaluation of superhydrophilic surfaces of dental implants - a systematic review and meta-analysis 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2019-05-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s12903-019-0767-8 
500 |a 1472-6831 
520 |a Abstract Background The characteristics of a dental implant surface have a decisive influence on the process of osseointegration. According to the current state of knowledge, surface modification can not only affect the morphology of cells, and in this way have a positive impact on osseointegration. Methods The objective of this study was to compare survival rates and marginal bone loss as well as assess the degree of stability of Straumann SLAactive® and Thomenn Incell® implants with a superhydrophilic surface. Authors present review of data published between 01.01.2008 and 12.31.2016 that was found in PubMed/MEDLINE internet database, An Internet search of databases produced a total of 1230 studies, 20 publications were finally selected for the present study based on the established selection and exclusion criteria. Results The statistical analysis was performed. A Cumulative Implant Survival Rate (CSR%) was 98.5%, Marginal bone loss (MBL) after 6 months was M = 0.60 mm and 0.6 5 mm after 12 months and secondary stability in a group Thommen implants M = 71.3 ISQ and M = 75.2 ISQ in group of Straumann. Conclusion Despite certain differences in the values of the studied parameters, both of the systems, i.e. Thommen Inicell and Straumann SLActive, demonstrated a high survival rate, a high level of implant stability and low marginal bone loss. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Straumann SLActive 
690 |a Thommen Inicell 
690 |a Prospective studies 
690 |a Randomized clinical trial 
690 |a Bone loss 
690 |a Alveolar bone loss 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BMC Oral Health, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2019) 
787 0 |n http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12903-019-0767-8 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1472-6831 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/df3d7c8fbb9d4457beadd9bb0de8d4c8  |z Connect to this object online.