Outcomes following use of a standard antibiotic protocol in the management of maxillofacial trauma patients

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of a standard antibiotic regimen protocol in the management of maxillofacial trauma patients. Materials and methods: The study sample included patients with at least one facial fracture and managed by either closed (CR/MMF) or open reduction (ORIF) by the Oral...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amit Sethi (Author), Emily Van Huekelom (Author), Pushkar Mehra (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Elsevier, 2020-10-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_df80a2ab5e8e4a14b55cf3146be068d5
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Amit Sethi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Emily Van Huekelom  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Pushkar Mehra  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Outcomes following use of a standard antibiotic protocol in the management of maxillofacial trauma patients 
260 |b Elsevier,   |c 2020-10-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2212-4268 
500 |a 10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.08.009 
520 |a Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of a standard antibiotic regimen protocol in the management of maxillofacial trauma patients. Materials and methods: The study sample included patients with at least one facial fracture and managed by either closed (CR/MMF) or open reduction (ORIF) by the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery service. A standardized antibiotic administration protocol based on type of treatment performed and timing of surgical intervention was used in the management of all patients. The primary predictor variable was antibiotic usage. The primary outcome measured was postoperative surgical site infection. Bivariate analysis was performed to assess the association between antibiotic exposure and postoperative surgical site infection. A p value of less than or equal to .05 was deemed to be significant. Results: The study sample comprised of 392 patients (102 midface and 290 mandible fractures). The mean age of the study group was 35 years and 89% of the patients were male. Postoperative infection was encountered in 18 patients (all with compound mandible fractures). The infection rates were 3.6% after CR/MMF and 8.7% after ORIF. No patient with midface fractures developed an infection. Chi-square test showed no statistically significant difference in postoperative infection rate in mandible fractures treated either by CR/MMF (p = 0.91) or ORIF (p = 0.94). Conclusions: Use of this antibiotic administration protocol limits antibiotic usage and standardizes their administration in the management of maxillofacial trauma without increasing the rate of postoperative surgical site infections. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Facial fractures 
690 |a Antibiotics 
690 |a Protocol 
690 |a Infection 
690 |a Surgical site 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research, Vol 10, Iss 4, Pp 519-522 (2020) 
787 0 |n http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426820301251 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2212-4268 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/df80a2ab5e8e4a14b55cf3146be068d5  |z Connect to this object online.