The status of health promotion lifestyle and its related factors in Shandong Province, China

• Main Authors: Qianqian Liu (Author), Shusheng Huang (Author), Xiaoyuan Qu (Author), Aitian Yin (Author)
• Format: Book
• Published: BMC, 2021-06-01T00:00:00Z.
• Subjects: article
• Online Access: Connect to this object online.
• Notes: 10.1186/s12889-021-11152-6; 1471-2458
• Keywords: Health attitude; Health promotion lifestyle; Health promotion; Cross-sectional study; Public aspects of medicine; RA1-1270
• Source: BMC Public Health, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2021)

Abstract Objectives This study aims to explore the status of Shandong Province, China residents' health promotion lifestyle and its influencing factors, especially to explore how health attitude affects health promotion lifestyle, thus can make targeted recommendations for health promotion in China and similar areas. Methods 1800 adults were selected from urban and rural areas of Shandong Province, China, using multistage stratified, cluster random sampling method. A survey was conducted face-to-face from March to May, 2018, using Health Promotion Lifestyle Profile and Health Attitude Questionnaire. The between-group measured data were compared by One-way ANOVA or t-tests. The correlation between the health attitude and health promotion lifestyle was examined by Pearson correlation. Logistic regression model was used to examine the related factors influencing health promotion lifestyle. Health promotion lifestyle is the dependent variable, and gender, education level, annual family per capita income and health attitude are the independent variables. Results The mean (SD) of HPLP-IICR total score of the participants was 82.12(16.63). 54.50% of the participants had poor or average health promotion lifestyle, while 45.50% had good or excellent health promotion lifestyle. Significant differences existed in health promotion lifestyle among different gender, education level, income level, marital status, and health attitude (Ps < 0.001). Multivariable Logistic regression model found that male (OR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.12-0.34), high school education level (OR = 0.57, 95% CI:0.17-0.41), junior middle school & below (OR = 0.42; 95% CI:0.12-0.33), annual family per capita income with < 10,000 CNY (OR = 2.53, 95% CI:1.24-2.06; OR = 2.14, 95% CI:1.08-3.12), low health affection (OR = 0.39, 95% CI:2.15-4.22), and low health behavioral intention (OR = 0.21; 95% CI: 2.33-5.29) were statistically significant correlates of average or poor health promotion lifestyle. Conclusions The health lifestyle needs to be further promoted in Shandong Province, China. The government and social sectors are encouraged to make more efforts to improve the accessibility and quality of health services. Meanwhile, individual responsibility cannot be ignored as well. More affective factors and operable measures should be added to enhance health affection and health behavioral intention, so as to enhance health promotion lifestyle.