Immunogenicity and safety of ebolavirus vaccines in healthy adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

ABSTRACTBackground This review aimed to systematically evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of the candidate Ebola virus vaccine (EVV).Methods We searched five databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of EVV on healthy adults. The primary outcomes were relative risk...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Juntao Yin (Author), Liang Zhang (Author), Chaoyang Wang (Author), Changjiang Qin (Author), Mingsan Miao (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Taylor & Francis Group, 2024-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_e0889d49f6cb4e90a2c0863fc4e9f14b
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Juntao Yin  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Liang Zhang  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Chaoyang Wang  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Changjiang Qin  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mingsan Miao  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Immunogenicity and safety of ebolavirus vaccines in healthy adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 
260 |b Taylor & Francis Group,   |c 2024-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1080/14760584.2023.2296937 
500 |a 1744-8395 
500 |a 1476-0584 
520 |a ABSTRACTBackground This review aimed to systematically evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of the candidate Ebola virus vaccine (EVV).Methods We searched five databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of EVV on healthy adults. The primary outcomes were relative risk (RR) of sero-conversion or sero-response of EVV in healthy adults between the groups that received EVV and the controls.Results Twenty-nine RCTs (n = 23573) were included. There was a significant difference in RR of sero-conversion of EVV (RR 13.18; 95% CI 11.28-15.41; I2 = 33%; P < 0.01) between the two groups. There was a significant difference in RR of adverse events (AEs) of EVV (RR 1.49; 95% CI 1.27-1.74; I2 = 88%; P < 0.01), although no difference in RR of serious AE (SAE) between the two groups. Subgroup analysis showed that there was no significant difference in RR of AEs for DNAEBO, EBOV-GP, MVA, and rVSVN4CT1 vaccines, compared with controls.Conclusions The DNAEBO, EBOV-GP, MVA, and rVSVN4CT1 vaccines are likely to be safe and immunogenic, tending to support the vaccination against Ebola disease. These findings should provide much-needed evidence for public health policy makers to develop preventive measures based on disease prevalence features and socio-economic conditions. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Ebolavirus 
690 |a vaccine 
690 |a Ebola disease 
690 |a immunogenicity 
690 |a safety 
690 |a systematic review 
690 |a Internal medicine 
690 |a RC31-1245 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Expert Review of Vaccines, Vol 23, Iss 1, Pp 148-159 (2024) 
787 0 |n https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/14760584.2023.2296937 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1476-0584 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1744-8395 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/e0889d49f6cb4e90a2c0863fc4e9f14b  |z Connect to this object online.