Immediate versus delayed induction of labour in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract Background Mothers with hypertensive disorder of pregnancy can be managed with either immediate or delayed induction of labour with expectant monitoring of both mother and baby. There are risks and benefits associated with both the type of interventions. Hence, this review was conducted to...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Jia Li (Author), Xuecheng Shao (Author), Shurong Song (Author), Qian Liang (Author), Yang Liu (Author), Xiaojin Qi (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
BMC,
2020-11-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring in women with pregnancy induced hypertension or mild preeclampsia at term: the HYPITAT trial
by: Mol Ben WJ, et al.
Published: (2007) -
Double- versus single-balloon catheters for labour induction and cervical ripening: a meta-analysis
by: Xiyao Liu, et al.
Published: (2019) -
Inpatient versus outpatient induction of labour: a systematic review and meta-analysis
by: Susan Dong, et al.
Published: (2020) -
"GINEXMAL RCT: Induction of labour versus expectant management in gestational diabetes pregnancies"
by: Hadar Eran, et al.
Published: (2011) -
Sublingual misoprostol versus dinoprostone gel in labour induction
by: Juveria Jahangir, et al.
Published: (2020)